This paper develops the notion that corruption is a contract between a public official and a private agent and that the features of this contract depend on the allocation of bargaining power between the parties. Active corruption thus occurs when the public official fixes the terms of the contract and is otherwise considered passive. Employing Italian data on various corruption-based regional-level crimes, the paper empirically reassesses the causes of corruption. A simple theoretical model highlights the differences between these two forms of corruption in terms of bribery and emphasizes the implications both for aggregate corruption and its measurement.

The determinants of the contract of corruption: theory and evidence

2016

Abstract

This paper develops the notion that corruption is a contract between a public official and a private agent and that the features of this contract depend on the allocation of bargaining power between the parties. Active corruption thus occurs when the public official fixes the terms of the contract and is otherwise considered passive. Employing Italian data on various corruption-based regional-level crimes, the paper empirically reassesses the causes of corruption. A simple theoretical model highlights the differences between these two forms of corruption in terms of bribery and emphasizes the implications both for aggregate corruption and its measurement.
2016
Istituto di Ricerca su Innovazione e Servizi per lo Sviluppo - IRISS
active corruption
passive corruption
bargaining power
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/332898
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact