This paper develops the notion that corruption is a contract between a public official and a private agent and that the features of this contract depend on the allocation of bargaining power between the parties. Active corruption thus occurs when the public official fixes the terms of the contract and is otherwise considered passive. Employing Italian data on various corruption-based regional-level crimes, the paper empirically reassesses the causes of corruption. A simple theoretical model highlights the differences between these two forms of corruption in terms of bribery and emphasizes the implications both for aggregate corruption and its measurement.
The determinants of the contract of corruption: theory and evidence
2016
Abstract
This paper develops the notion that corruption is a contract between a public official and a private agent and that the features of this contract depend on the allocation of bargaining power between the parties. Active corruption thus occurs when the public official fixes the terms of the contract and is otherwise considered passive. Employing Italian data on various corruption-based regional-level crimes, the paper empirically reassesses the causes of corruption. A simple theoretical model highlights the differences between these two forms of corruption in terms of bribery and emphasizes the implications both for aggregate corruption and its measurement.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


