The International Platform on Adaptation Metrics (IPAM) presents this submission to the UNFCCC in response to the call for information on existing indicators for measuring progress towards the targets referred to in paragraphs 9-10 of decision 2/CMA.5. As a global network of 128 experts from 38 countries, IPAM focuses on developing and promoting robust climate adaptation metrics. We propose three key attributes for adaptation metrics: clear identification with climate change adaptation, wide applicability, and scalability/comparability/aggregability. IPAM has developed approaches such as the Adaptation Metrics Mapping Evaluation (AMME) Framework to support comprehensive evaluation of adaptation metrics. Our sectoral committees on Cities, Water, and Agriculture provide insights on existing indicators, methodological challenges, and gaps in these critical areas. The Cities Committee's systematic review reveals regional disparities and a need for standardized frameworks in urban adaptation metrics. The Water Committee emphasizes the importance of considering various scales, risks, and types of interventions in water-related adaptation indicators. The Agriculture Committee highlights the need for outcome and impact indicators to assess long-term effects of adaptation actions in the agricultural sector. IPAM recommends adopting a systematic approach to evaluating indicators based on the proposed criteria of identification, applicability, and scalability.
IPAM's second submission to the UAE-Belem Work Programme of the UNFCCC.
Filomena Pietrapertosa;
2024
Abstract
The International Platform on Adaptation Metrics (IPAM) presents this submission to the UNFCCC in response to the call for information on existing indicators for measuring progress towards the targets referred to in paragraphs 9-10 of decision 2/CMA.5. As a global network of 128 experts from 38 countries, IPAM focuses on developing and promoting robust climate adaptation metrics. We propose three key attributes for adaptation metrics: clear identification with climate change adaptation, wide applicability, and scalability/comparability/aggregability. IPAM has developed approaches such as the Adaptation Metrics Mapping Evaluation (AMME) Framework to support comprehensive evaluation of adaptation metrics. Our sectoral committees on Cities, Water, and Agriculture provide insights on existing indicators, methodological challenges, and gaps in these critical areas. The Cities Committee's systematic review reveals regional disparities and a need for standardized frameworks in urban adaptation metrics. The Water Committee emphasizes the importance of considering various scales, risks, and types of interventions in water-related adaptation indicators. The Agriculture Committee highlights the need for outcome and impact indicators to assess long-term effects of adaptation actions in the agricultural sector. IPAM recommends adopting a systematic approach to evaluating indicators based on the proposed criteria of identification, applicability, and scalability.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
202408011717---Second IPAM submission to UAE-Belen WP.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Dominio pubblico
Dimensione
399.19 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
399.19 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


