The gEneSys’ project deliverable 1.1. (D1.1 thereafter) entitled “Systematic literature review of studies at the nexus of gender equality and sustainable energy systems and ontology of energy systems” brings together the work performed by Task 1.1 (Systematic literature review to design analytical framework for review of EU and national energy transition-related policy frameworks) and Task 1.2. (Defining the mission, agendas, and identifying the change actors in the evolution to sustainable energy systems) in the first eight months since the project’s onset. This makes D1.1 deliverable particularly long and rich in insights. Indeed, the afore-mentioned tasks had the overarching goal of setting the groundwork for the tasks and deliverables coming later in the project’s lifecycle. However, it is worth noting that the two tasks focused on different aspects and dimensions. The ontology task was intended to deliver a comprehensive picture of objects and relationships in the energy transition domain and try to delimitate the area of action of the gEneSys project in transforming gendered power relations in energy transition pathways. In other words, the ontology probes what are the key concepts emerging in the extant literature on energy transition and how these concepts are interrelated. The ontology can also unveil missing or overlooked concepts that can be brought to the forefront in future research. Another scope of the ontology is also the establishment of a “common language” for the project, with a set of terms and related definitions. Although not focusing specifically on the gender dimensions, the energy transition ontology can be considered as a guidance to navigate the energy transition knowledge domain. However, it should not be assumed as an immutable output; rather it can be expanded and enriched with new analyses or conceptualizations. On the other hand, the literature review task has looked specifically into the state of knowledge at the nexus between gender and energy transition, by examining how this nexus has been disentangled in scientific publications as well as in the grey literature. As shown in the sections below, scientific publications were sifted through using a systematic literature review (SLR) methodology (Mengist et al. 2020) which allows answers to formulated research questions by defining search strings and identifying specific eligibility and quality assessment criteria for inclusion/exclusion of search results. SLRs can be...

D.1.1 - Systematic literature review of the studies at the nexus of gender equality and sustainable energy systems and ontology of energy systems.pdf

Daniela Luzi;Cloe Mirenda;Fabrizio Pecoraro;LUCIO PISACANE;Nicolò Marchesini;Serena Tagliacozzo;MARCO CELLINI;Cristiana Crescimbene;
2023

Abstract

The gEneSys’ project deliverable 1.1. (D1.1 thereafter) entitled “Systematic literature review of studies at the nexus of gender equality and sustainable energy systems and ontology of energy systems” brings together the work performed by Task 1.1 (Systematic literature review to design analytical framework for review of EU and national energy transition-related policy frameworks) and Task 1.2. (Defining the mission, agendas, and identifying the change actors in the evolution to sustainable energy systems) in the first eight months since the project’s onset. This makes D1.1 deliverable particularly long and rich in insights. Indeed, the afore-mentioned tasks had the overarching goal of setting the groundwork for the tasks and deliverables coming later in the project’s lifecycle. However, it is worth noting that the two tasks focused on different aspects and dimensions. The ontology task was intended to deliver a comprehensive picture of objects and relationships in the energy transition domain and try to delimitate the area of action of the gEneSys project in transforming gendered power relations in energy transition pathways. In other words, the ontology probes what are the key concepts emerging in the extant literature on energy transition and how these concepts are interrelated. The ontology can also unveil missing or overlooked concepts that can be brought to the forefront in future research. Another scope of the ontology is also the establishment of a “common language” for the project, with a set of terms and related definitions. Although not focusing specifically on the gender dimensions, the energy transition ontology can be considered as a guidance to navigate the energy transition knowledge domain. However, it should not be assumed as an immutable output; rather it can be expanded and enriched with new analyses or conceptualizations. On the other hand, the literature review task has looked specifically into the state of knowledge at the nexus between gender and energy transition, by examining how this nexus has been disentangled in scientific publications as well as in the grey literature. As shown in the sections below, scientific publications were sifted through using a systematic literature review (SLR) methodology (Mengist et al. 2020) which allows answers to formulated research questions by defining search strings and identifying specific eligibility and quality assessment criteria for inclusion/exclusion of search results. SLRs can be...
2023
Istituto di Ricerche sulla Popolazione e le Politiche Sociali - IRPPS
Rapporto intermedio di progetto
Gender equality, Gender-energy nexus, Systematic literature review, Energy Systems, Ontology of energy systems
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
gEneSys - D.1.1 - Systematic literature review of the studies at the nexus of gender equality and sustainable energy systems and ontology of energy systems-3.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 6.06 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
6.06 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/516223
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact