Objectives: The Radiation Protection of Patients (RPoP) Unit of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is concerned about the effectiveness of justification of diagnostic medical exposures. Recent published work and the report of an initial IAEA Consultation in the area gave grounds for such concerns. There is a significant level of inappropriate usage, and, in some cases, a poor level of awareness of dose and risk among some key groups involved. Methods: The IAEA convened a second group of experts in November 2008 to review practical and achievable actions that might lead to more effective justification. Results: This report summarises the matters that this group considered and the outcome of their deliberations. Conclusions: There is a need for improved communication, both within professions and between professionals on one hand, and between professionals and the patients/ public on the other. Coupled with this, the issue of consent to imaging procedures was revisited. The need for good evidence-based referral guidelines or criteria of acceptability was emphasised, as was the need for their global adaptation and dissemination. Clinical audit was regarded as a key tool in ensuring that justification becomes an effective, transparent and accountable part of normal radiological practice. In summary, justification would be facilitated by the ''3 As'': awareness, appropriateness and audit.

Justification of diagnostic medical exposures, some practical issues: report of an International Atomic Energy Agency Consultation

Picano E;
2012

Abstract

Objectives: The Radiation Protection of Patients (RPoP) Unit of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is concerned about the effectiveness of justification of diagnostic medical exposures. Recent published work and the report of an initial IAEA Consultation in the area gave grounds for such concerns. There is a significant level of inappropriate usage, and, in some cases, a poor level of awareness of dose and risk among some key groups involved. Methods: The IAEA convened a second group of experts in November 2008 to review practical and achievable actions that might lead to more effective justification. Results: This report summarises the matters that this group considered and the outcome of their deliberations. Conclusions: There is a need for improved communication, both within professions and between professionals on one hand, and between professionals and the patients/ public on the other. Coupled with this, the issue of consent to imaging procedures was revisited. The need for good evidence-based referral guidelines or criteria of acceptability was emphasised, as was the need for their global adaptation and dissemination. Clinical audit was regarded as a key tool in ensuring that justification becomes an effective, transparent and accountable part of normal radiological practice. In summary, justification would be facilitated by the ''3 As'': awareness, appropriateness and audit.
2012
Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica - IFC
Radiation protection
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_201286-doc_45781.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Justification of diagnostic medical exposures
Dimensione 400.89 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
400.89 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/10166
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 156
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 126
social impact