Abstract The purposes of this study were to determine the (1) frequency with which nonenhanced computed tomography (CT) (NECT) permits conclusive diagnosis of acute appen- dicitis, (2) accuracy of NECT when findings are conclusive, and (3) over- all accuracy of a CT protocol consist- ing of NECT with selective use of contrast. Five hundred and thirty-six patients underwent a NECT protocol with selective use of contrast. Diag- nostic accuracy was then determined separately for (1) patients with con- clusive initial NECT, (2) patients with inconclusive initial NECT, and (3) all patients. NECT was conclusive on initial interpretation in 404/536 pa- tients and inconclusive in 132/536. Of 132 inconclusive studies, 126 wererepeated with contrast (intravenous, oral or rectal). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value for diagnosis of acute appendi- citis were (1) 90%, 96.0%, 84.8%, and 97.4% in patients with conclusive NECT(n = 404);(2)95.6%,92.3%, 73%, and 99% in patients with inconclusive NECT followed by re- peat CT with contrast; and (3) 91.3%, 95%, 82%, and 98% in all patients. The initial diagnosis of appendicitis may be made by NECT in 75% of patients, with contrast administration reserved for inconclusive NECT studies.

Acute appendicitis: diagnostic value of nonenhanced CT with selective use of contrast in routine clinical settings

Brunetti A;
2007

Abstract

Abstract The purposes of this study were to determine the (1) frequency with which nonenhanced computed tomography (CT) (NECT) permits conclusive diagnosis of acute appen- dicitis, (2) accuracy of NECT when findings are conclusive, and (3) over- all accuracy of a CT protocol consist- ing of NECT with selective use of contrast. Five hundred and thirty-six patients underwent a NECT protocol with selective use of contrast. Diag- nostic accuracy was then determined separately for (1) patients with con- clusive initial NECT, (2) patients with inconclusive initial NECT, and (3) all patients. NECT was conclusive on initial interpretation in 404/536 pa- tients and inconclusive in 132/536. Of 132 inconclusive studies, 126 wererepeated with contrast (intravenous, oral or rectal). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value for diagnosis of acute appendi- citis were (1) 90%, 96.0%, 84.8%, and 97.4% in patients with conclusive NECT(n = 404);(2)95.6%,92.3%, 73%, and 99% in patients with inconclusive NECT followed by re- peat CT with contrast; and (3) 91.3%, 95%, 82%, and 98% in all patients. The initial diagnosis of appendicitis may be made by NECT in 75% of patients, with contrast administration reserved for inconclusive NECT studies.
2007
Istituto di Biostrutture e Bioimmagini - IBB - Sede Napoli
Computed Tomography
acute appendicitis
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/117286
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 32
social impact