A study of temporal and spatial distribution of zooplankton frequently requires identification to species level. In such studies, samples are usually fixed, but according to different authors rotifer genera such as Synchaeta (Ehrenberg, 1832) can only be identified in live samples. A procedure for the identification of preserved specimens of Synchaeta is presented, permitting ecological studies without the examination of live material. Trophus morphology, investigated by light and scanning electron microscopy, was related to morphological characteristics of preserved specimens. In this way, body length was used to group formalin-preserved specimens into Synchaeta gr. tremulaoblonga sensu Ruttner-Kolisko (1974) (p170 mm) or Synchaeta gr. stylata-pectinata sensu Ruttner-Kolisko (1974) (X190 mm). Furthermore, body length, colour and shape were used to identify Synchaeta grandis (Zacharias, 1893), Synchaeta pectinata (Ehrenberg, 1832), Synchaeta kitina (Rousselet, 1902) and Synchaeta lakowitziana (Lucks, 1930). It was, however, impossible to distinguish Synchaeta tremula (Mu¨ ller, 1786) from Synchaeta oblonga (Ehrenberg, 1832) by their trophi because of contradictions in the diagnostic keys and monographs regarding trophus morphology. r 2006 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. Keywords: Zooplankton; Rotifers; SEM; Formalin-preserved samples

Trophi morphology and its usefulness for identification of formalin-preserved species of Synchaeta Ehrenberg (Rotifera: Monogononta: Synchaetidae)

Arrighetti G;
2006

Abstract

A study of temporal and spatial distribution of zooplankton frequently requires identification to species level. In such studies, samples are usually fixed, but according to different authors rotifer genera such as Synchaeta (Ehrenberg, 1832) can only be identified in live samples. A procedure for the identification of preserved specimens of Synchaeta is presented, permitting ecological studies without the examination of live material. Trophus morphology, investigated by light and scanning electron microscopy, was related to morphological characteristics of preserved specimens. In this way, body length was used to group formalin-preserved specimens into Synchaeta gr. tremulaoblonga sensu Ruttner-Kolisko (1974) (p170 mm) or Synchaeta gr. stylata-pectinata sensu Ruttner-Kolisko (1974) (X190 mm). Furthermore, body length, colour and shape were used to identify Synchaeta grandis (Zacharias, 1893), Synchaeta pectinata (Ehrenberg, 1832), Synchaeta kitina (Rousselet, 1902) and Synchaeta lakowitziana (Lucks, 1930). It was, however, impossible to distinguish Synchaeta tremula (Mu¨ ller, 1786) from Synchaeta oblonga (Ehrenberg, 1832) by their trophi because of contradictions in the diagnostic keys and monographs regarding trophus morphology. r 2006 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. Keywords: Zooplankton; Rotifers; SEM; Formalin-preserved samples
2006
Istituto di Cristallografia - IC
Istituto per la Valorizzazione del Legno e delle Specie Arboree - IVALSA - Sede Sesto Fiorentino
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/119784
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 23
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact