A mechanistic growth model was used to evaluate the mean yield and yield variability of grapevine Vitis vinifera L. under current and future climates. The model used was previously validated using field experiment data. The effect of elevated CO2 on grapevine growth was also considered. Adaptation of 2 varieties (Sangiovese and Cabernet Sauvignon) to scenarios of increased CO2 and climate change, and potential changes in agricultural risk (i.e. inter-seasonal variability), were examined. Before testing the effect of climate scenarios, we analysed the sensitivity of modelled grapevine yield to arbitrary changes in the 3 driving variables (temperature, solar radiation and CO2). The results showed the model to be more sensitive to changes in CO2 concentration and temperature than to changes in radiation. Analyses made using transient GCM (general circulation model) scenarios (UKTR and GFDL) showed different changes in mean fruit dry matter for the different scenarios, whereas mean total dry matter, and fruit and total dry matter variability, were predicted to increase under almost all the scenarios. Predictions based on equilibrium scenarios (UKLO and UKHI) gave similar results. For Sangiovese, variety adaptation analysis suggested a better adaptation in terms of mean production, but a worse adaptation in terms of yield variability.

Modelling the impact of future climate scenarios on yield variability of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.).

Marco Bindi
;
Luca Fibbi;Bernardo Gozzini;Simone Orlandini;Francesco Miglietta
1996

Abstract

A mechanistic growth model was used to evaluate the mean yield and yield variability of grapevine Vitis vinifera L. under current and future climates. The model used was previously validated using field experiment data. The effect of elevated CO2 on grapevine growth was also considered. Adaptation of 2 varieties (Sangiovese and Cabernet Sauvignon) to scenarios of increased CO2 and climate change, and potential changes in agricultural risk (i.e. inter-seasonal variability), were examined. Before testing the effect of climate scenarios, we analysed the sensitivity of modelled grapevine yield to arbitrary changes in the 3 driving variables (temperature, solar radiation and CO2). The results showed the model to be more sensitive to changes in CO2 concentration and temperature than to changes in radiation. Analyses made using transient GCM (general circulation model) scenarios (UKTR and GFDL) showed different changes in mean fruit dry matter for the different scenarios, whereas mean total dry matter, and fruit and total dry matter variability, were predicted to increase under almost all the scenarios. Predictions based on equilibrium scenarios (UKLO and UKHI) gave similar results. For Sangiovese, variety adaptation analysis suggested a better adaptation in terms of mean production, but a worse adaptation in terms of yield variability.
1996
Istituto di Biometeorologia - IBIMET - Sede Firenze (attivo dal 18/11/1923 al 31/12/2021)
Inglese
7
3
213
224
12
https://www.int-res.com/abstracts/cr/v07/p213-224
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
Grapevine · cv. Sangiovese · cv. Cabernet Sauvignon · Climate change · GCM scenarios · Agricultural risk
Internazionale
Elettronico
No
5
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Bindi, Marco; Fibbi, Luca; Gozzini, Bernardo; Orlandini, Simone; Miglietta, Francesco
01 Contributo su Rivista::01.01 Articolo in rivista
restricted
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_223149-doc_53483.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Modelling_the_impact_of_future_climate_scenarios_on_yield_and_yield_variability_of_grapevine
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 887.62 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
887.62 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/120405
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 192
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 161
social impact