The quality of the predictive response of a structural domain, under a random and convective load, is here analyzed by discussing each step of the numerical procedure. The structural response, due to a wall pressure distribution, is derived in modal coordinates according to a finite element scheme. The modal basis can include the dry or wet (aeroelastic) structural mode shapes: in the present analysis only the in vacuum eigenvectors are used. For such a problem one of the most critical points is the transformation of the pressure distribution into discrete locations. In fact, this step depends on (i) the assumed TBL model, (ii) the integration scheme and (iii) the frequency range. These three points are the goals of the present work where the specific sensitivity to each of them is investigated. The transformation of the pressure distribution into discrete locations can be computationally expensive for the desired level of the required numerical approximation. The use of consistent formulation in the finite element scheme can be unfeasible. Moreover the approximations, in expressing the pressure field, can have a different influence on the structural responses according to the chosen TBL models. This is another key aspect of the present work.

SENSITIVITY OF THE PREDICTIVE STRUCTURAL MODELS UNDER STOCHASTIC AND CONVECTIVE EXCITATION

Ciappi E;Magionesi F
2010

Abstract

The quality of the predictive response of a structural domain, under a random and convective load, is here analyzed by discussing each step of the numerical procedure. The structural response, due to a wall pressure distribution, is derived in modal coordinates according to a finite element scheme. The modal basis can include the dry or wet (aeroelastic) structural mode shapes: in the present analysis only the in vacuum eigenvectors are used. For such a problem one of the most critical points is the transformation of the pressure distribution into discrete locations. In fact, this step depends on (i) the assumed TBL model, (ii) the integration scheme and (iii) the frequency range. These three points are the goals of the present work where the specific sensitivity to each of them is investigated. The transformation of the pressure distribution into discrete locations can be computationally expensive for the desired level of the required numerical approximation. The use of consistent formulation in the finite element scheme can be unfeasible. Moreover the approximations, in expressing the pressure field, can have a different influence on the structural responses according to the chosen TBL models. This is another key aspect of the present work.
2010
Inglese
ASME 2010 7th International Symposium on Fluid-Structure Interactions, Flow-Sound Interactions, and Flow-Induced Vibration and Noise
9780791854518
ASME-American Society Of Mechanical Engineers
New York
STATI UNITI D'AMERICA
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
1-5 Agosto
Montreal, Canada
Structural mode shape
Structural models
Structural response
Model structures
Models
Volume 3, Issue PARTS A AND B, 2010, Pages 1237-1247 ASME 2010 3rd Joint US-European Fluids Engineering Summer Meeting, FEDSM 2010 - ASME 2010 7th International Symposium on Fluid-Structure Interactions, Flow-Sound Interactions, and Flow-Induced Vibration and Noise, FSI2 and FIV+N
2
none
Franco F.; De Rosa S.; Ciappi E.; Magionesi F.
273
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
04 Contributo in convegno::04.01 Contributo in Atti di convegno
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/13824
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact