Partial rootzone drying (PRD) and regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) are water-saving irrigation systems that have been developed to increase water-use efficiency (WUE) without significant yield reduction. In order to investigate whether a highvalue horticultural crop such as tomato responded differently to RDI and PRD, we compared the physiological and growth responses of tomato plants using a split-root system. Plants were grown in a greenhouse under controlled conditions with their roots separated equally between two soil compartments. Three irrigation treatments were imposed: (i) Control, receiving an amount of water equivalent to 100% of plant transpiration; (ii) PRD, in which one compartment was watered with 50% of the amount of water supplied to the controls, allowing one-half of the root system to be exposed to dry soil and switching irrigation between sides weekly; and (iii) RDI, in which 50% of the amount of water given to the controls was supplied, half to each side of the root system. Leaf RWC and midday leaf C decreased substantially in RDI-treated plants, while the PRD plants exhibited relatively higher C and RWC values. Both PRD and RDI treatments reduced by about 30% the total plant dry mass compared with the control. However, plant transpiration was reduced by about 50% in both PRD and RDI, allowing a significant improvement in whole-plant WUE. Stomatal conductance (Gs) and leaf growth were also significantly reduced by PRD and RDI. These results may be related to a significant increase in xylem sap pH and leaf apoplastic pH. Generally, the photosynthetic apparatus of tomato leaves had a high resistance to restricted water availability. In fact, the decreased Gs had no major negative impact on carbon assimilation. However, Vcmax, i.e. Rubisco efficiency, was significantly decreased in RDI plants with respect to control ones. This may imply that, although the differences between the PRD and RDI treatments in our study were subtle, they may become more marked with a more prolonged and severe water deficit.
Water relations, growth, photosynthesis and water use efficiency in tomato plant subjected to partial rootzone drying (PRD) and regulated deficit irrigation (RDI).
Centritto M
2007
Abstract
Partial rootzone drying (PRD) and regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) are water-saving irrigation systems that have been developed to increase water-use efficiency (WUE) without significant yield reduction. In order to investigate whether a highvalue horticultural crop such as tomato responded differently to RDI and PRD, we compared the physiological and growth responses of tomato plants using a split-root system. Plants were grown in a greenhouse under controlled conditions with their roots separated equally between two soil compartments. Three irrigation treatments were imposed: (i) Control, receiving an amount of water equivalent to 100% of plant transpiration; (ii) PRD, in which one compartment was watered with 50% of the amount of water supplied to the controls, allowing one-half of the root system to be exposed to dry soil and switching irrigation between sides weekly; and (iii) RDI, in which 50% of the amount of water given to the controls was supplied, half to each side of the root system. Leaf RWC and midday leaf C decreased substantially in RDI-treated plants, while the PRD plants exhibited relatively higher C and RWC values. Both PRD and RDI treatments reduced by about 30% the total plant dry mass compared with the control. However, plant transpiration was reduced by about 50% in both PRD and RDI, allowing a significant improvement in whole-plant WUE. Stomatal conductance (Gs) and leaf growth were also significantly reduced by PRD and RDI. These results may be related to a significant increase in xylem sap pH and leaf apoplastic pH. Generally, the photosynthetic apparatus of tomato leaves had a high resistance to restricted water availability. In fact, the decreased Gs had no major negative impact on carbon assimilation. However, Vcmax, i.e. Rubisco efficiency, was significantly decreased in RDI plants with respect to control ones. This may imply that, although the differences between the PRD and RDI treatments in our study were subtle, they may become more marked with a more prolonged and severe water deficit.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
