The objective of this study was to apply finite mixture models to field data for somatic cell scores (SCS) for estimation of genetic parameters. Data were approximately 170,000 test-day records for SCS from first-parity Holstein cows in Wisconsin. Five different models of increasing level of complexity were fitted. Model 1 was the standard single-component model, and the others were 2-component Gaussian mixtures consisting of similar but distinct linear models. All mixture models (i.e., 2 to 5) included separate means for the 2 components. Model 2 assumed entirely homogeneous variances for both components. Models 3 and 4 assumed heterogeneous variances for either residual (model 3) or genetic and permanent environmental variances (model 4). Model 5 was the most complex, in which variances of all random effects were allowed to vary across components. A Bayesian approach was applied and Gibbs sampling was used to obtain posterior estimates. Five chains of 205,000 cycles were generated for each model. Estimates of variance components were based on posterior means. Models were compared by use of the deviance information criterion. Based on the deviance information criterion, all mixture models were superior to the linear model for analysis of SCS. The best model was one in which genetic and PE variances were heterogeneous, but residual variances were homogeneous. The genetic analysis suggested that SCS in healthy and infected cattle are different traits, because the genetic correlation between SCS in the 2 components of 0.13 was significantly different from unity.
Genetic analysis of somatic cell scores in US Holsteins with a Bayesian mixture model.
Boettcher PJ;
2007
Abstract
The objective of this study was to apply finite mixture models to field data for somatic cell scores (SCS) for estimation of genetic parameters. Data were approximately 170,000 test-day records for SCS from first-parity Holstein cows in Wisconsin. Five different models of increasing level of complexity were fitted. Model 1 was the standard single-component model, and the others were 2-component Gaussian mixtures consisting of similar but distinct linear models. All mixture models (i.e., 2 to 5) included separate means for the 2 components. Model 2 assumed entirely homogeneous variances for both components. Models 3 and 4 assumed heterogeneous variances for either residual (model 3) or genetic and permanent environmental variances (model 4). Model 5 was the most complex, in which variances of all random effects were allowed to vary across components. A Bayesian approach was applied and Gibbs sampling was used to obtain posterior estimates. Five chains of 205,000 cycles were generated for each model. Estimates of variance components were based on posterior means. Models were compared by use of the deviance information criterion. Based on the deviance information criterion, all mixture models were superior to the linear model for analysis of SCS. The best model was one in which genetic and PE variances were heterogeneous, but residual variances were homogeneous. The genetic analysis suggested that SCS in healthy and infected cattle are different traits, because the genetic correlation between SCS in the 2 components of 0.13 was significantly different from unity.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.