By means of the yeast two-hybrid system, we have discovered a novel physical interaction between the adenovirus E1A oncoprotein and Ran, a small GTPase which regulates nucleocytoplasmic transport, cell cycle progression, and mitotic spindle organization. Expression of E1A elicits induction of S phase and centrosome amplification in a variety of rodent cell lines. The induction of supernumerary centrosomes requires functional RCC1, the nucleotide exchange factor for Ran and, hence, a functional Ran network. The E1A portion responsible for the interaction with Ran is the extreme NH(2)-terminal region (amino acids 1-36), which is also required for the induction of centrosome amplification. In an in vitro assay with recombinant proteins, wild-type E1A interferes with nucleotide exchange on Ran, whereas an E1A mutant, deleted from the extreme NH(2)-terminal region, does not. In addition, we detected an in vitro interaction between Ran and HPV-16 E7 and SV40 large T antigen, two oncoproteins functionally related to E1A. These findings suggest a common pathway of these oncoproteins in eliciting virus-induced genomic instability.

E1A deregulates the centrosome cycle in a Ran GTPase-dependent manner.

Palena A;Lavia P;
2003

Abstract

By means of the yeast two-hybrid system, we have discovered a novel physical interaction between the adenovirus E1A oncoprotein and Ran, a small GTPase which regulates nucleocytoplasmic transport, cell cycle progression, and mitotic spindle organization. Expression of E1A elicits induction of S phase and centrosome amplification in a variety of rodent cell lines. The induction of supernumerary centrosomes requires functional RCC1, the nucleotide exchange factor for Ran and, hence, a functional Ran network. The E1A portion responsible for the interaction with Ran is the extreme NH(2)-terminal region (amino acids 1-36), which is also required for the induction of centrosome amplification. In an in vitro assay with recombinant proteins, wild-type E1A interferes with nucleotide exchange on Ran, whereas an E1A mutant, deleted from the extreme NH(2)-terminal region, does not. In addition, we detected an in vitro interaction between Ran and HPV-16 E7 and SV40 large T antigen, two oncoproteins functionally related to E1A. These findings suggest a common pathway of these oncoproteins in eliciting virus-induced genomic instability.
2003
Istituto di Biologia e Patologia Molecolari - IBPM
Inglese
63
1430
1437
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
Oncogenic viruses
Cancer
genomic instability
Small GTPases
The induction of genomic instability in viral carcinogenesis has now been recognized for almost twenty years. The findings in this paper provide a novel mechanism and expand our understanding of viral oncogenesis. These results were obtained in the framework of a very fruitful collaboration between our lab and colleagues at the Regina Elena Cancer Institute in Rome (both first authorship and senior authorship are joint in this publication). The paper is published in a prestigious journal published by the American Association for Cancer Research with an impact factor of 8,3 in 2002.
2
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
De Luca A; Mangiacasale R; Severino A; Malquori L; Baldi A; Palena A; Mileo AM; Lavia P; Paggi MG.
01 Contributo su Rivista::01.01 Articolo in rivista
none
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/164435
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact