In his Comment, Krakoviack [Phys. Rev. B 76, 136401 (2007)] finds that the phase behavior of the s+p spin-glass model is different from that proposed by Crisanti and Leuzzi [Phys. Rev. B 73, 014412 (2006)] if s and p are larger than 2 and are separated well enough. He proposes a trial picture, based on a one step replica symmetry breaking solution, displaying a mode-coupling-like glass-to-glass transition line ending in an A(3) singularity. However, actually, the physics of these systems changes when p-s is large, the instability of which the one step replica symmetry breaking glassy phase suffers turns out to be so wide ranging that the whole scenario proposed by Krakoviack must be seriously reconsidered.
Reply to 'Comment on 'Spherical 2+p spin-glass model: An analytically solvable model with a glass-to-glass transition' '
Crisanti A;Leuzzi L
2007
Abstract
In his Comment, Krakoviack [Phys. Rev. B 76, 136401 (2007)] finds that the phase behavior of the s+p spin-glass model is different from that proposed by Crisanti and Leuzzi [Phys. Rev. B 73, 014412 (2006)] if s and p are larger than 2 and are separated well enough. He proposes a trial picture, based on a one step replica symmetry breaking solution, displaying a mode-coupling-like glass-to-glass transition line ending in an A(3) singularity. However, actually, the physics of these systems changes when p-s is large, the instability of which the one step replica symmetry breaking glassy phase suffers turns out to be so wide ranging that the whole scenario proposed by Krakoviack must be seriously reconsidered.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
