The definition of an epistemic standpoint goes back to Aristotle's explanation in Analytica posteriora I, 27 of the role played by prósthesis in the passage from the »unity, which is a substance without position, to the point, which is a unity with a position: this passage is the result of a determination [ek prosthéseôs]« (87a34-36). The position of a determination (prósthesis can also be rendered with addition) or the lack thereof generates the haplôs (simpliciter) and ek prosthéseôs (secundum quid) distinction of Analytica priora I, 38 (49a12-49b33), whereby the secundum quid, i.e., the trópos epistêmês of Metaphysica I min., 3 (995a14-15) is the result of a determination by the knowing subject, in as far as he configures a domain of objects. In De anima III, 7 Aristotle states that a cognition in act is identical with its object (431a1) and in Ethica Nichomachea I, 7 makes the examples of the carpenter and the geometer looking at the same angle, the former being content with an approximation that satisfies the objectives of his work, while the latter, who is a student of truth, looks at its essence at essential attributes (1098a 29-42).

The Epistemic Standpoint from Kant to Hegel

Pozzo R
2007

Abstract

The definition of an epistemic standpoint goes back to Aristotle's explanation in Analytica posteriora I, 27 of the role played by prósthesis in the passage from the »unity, which is a substance without position, to the point, which is a unity with a position: this passage is the result of a determination [ek prosthéseôs]« (87a34-36). The position of a determination (prósthesis can also be rendered with addition) or the lack thereof generates the haplôs (simpliciter) and ek prosthéseôs (secundum quid) distinction of Analytica priora I, 38 (49a12-49b33), whereby the secundum quid, i.e., the trópos epistêmês of Metaphysica I min., 3 (995a14-15) is the result of a determination by the knowing subject, in as far as he configures a domain of objects. In De anima III, 7 Aristotle states that a cognition in act is identical with its object (431a1) and in Ethica Nichomachea I, 7 makes the examples of the carpenter and the geometer looking at the same angle, the former being content with an approximation that satisfies the objectives of his work, while the latter, who is a student of truth, looks at its essence at essential attributes (1098a 29-42).
2007
Istituto per il Lessico Intellettuale Europeo e Storia delle Idee - ILIESI
Aristotle
Kant
Hegel
epistemic logic
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/169680
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact