Man’s knowledge of ecosystems is in constant evolution. This is a consequence of the increased understanding of the underlying biology, but also of the increased collaboration between disciplines that in the past did not interact in the same way and intensity as they do today. In fact, more and more ecosystem scientists are building on what now may be considered solid foundations laid out by disciplines such as biology, ecology, physics, and also computer science (see, for instance, Waring and Running 1998; Patil and Myers 1999). A good understanding of ecosystem processes is vital as it leads to models, which, in turn, provide us ways to predict the possible future behavior of ecosystems under changing conditions. Most models include fluxes of carbon, water, and nitrogen, and are able to provide estimates of gross primary production (GPP) and net primary production (NPP) of carbon per unit area. In the past decade, the numbers of sites where canopy fluxes of carbon and water were measured increased exponentially (Baldocchi et al. 2001) and net ecosystem exchange (NEE) became available as well. Hence, modelers were recently provided with calibration and validation data for the complete process of ecosystem carbon exchange, up to net ecosystem production (NEP=NEE) and even net biome productivity (NBP; see Fig. 9.1)

A model-based approach for the estimation of carbon sinks in European forests

Matteucci G;Chiesi M;
2003

Abstract

Man’s knowledge of ecosystems is in constant evolution. This is a consequence of the increased understanding of the underlying biology, but also of the increased collaboration between disciplines that in the past did not interact in the same way and intensity as they do today. In fact, more and more ecosystem scientists are building on what now may be considered solid foundations laid out by disciplines such as biology, ecology, physics, and also computer science (see, for instance, Waring and Running 1998; Patil and Myers 1999). A good understanding of ecosystem processes is vital as it leads to models, which, in turn, provide us ways to predict the possible future behavior of ecosystems under changing conditions. Most models include fluxes of carbon, water, and nitrogen, and are able to provide estimates of gross primary production (GPP) and net primary production (NPP) of carbon per unit area. In the past decade, the numbers of sites where canopy fluxes of carbon and water were measured increased exponentially (Baldocchi et al. 2001) and net ecosystem exchange (NEE) became available as well. Hence, modelers were recently provided with calibration and validation data for the complete process of ecosystem carbon exchange, up to net ecosystem production (NEP=NEE) and even net biome productivity (NBP; see Fig. 9.1)
2003
Istituto di Biometeorologia - IBIMET - Sede Firenze (attivo dal 18/11/1923 al 31/12/2021)
Inglese
Riccardo Valentini
Fluxes of carbon, water and energy in European forests
169
206
38
3-540-43791-6
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
Elettronico
6
02 Contributo in Volume::02.01 Contributo in volume (Capitolo o Saggio)
268
restricted
Mollicone, D; Matteucci, G; Köble, R; Masci, A; Chiesi, M; Smits, Pc
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Cap_9_Mollicone_et_al_proofs.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: A Model-Based Approach for the Estimation of Carbon Sinks in European Forests
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 334.61 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
334.61 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/173869
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact