To assess the relationships among single-breath diffusing capacity for CO (DL(CO)sb) (13), respiratory symptoms, and cigarette smoking in a general population sample, the data of 718 men and 894 women 20 year of age or older were analyzed, and comparisons were performed with flow-volume curve (MEFV) variables and the slope of the alveolar plateau (DN2%/L) as well. Percent predicted DL(CO)sb and its correction for alveolar volume (DL/VA) were significantly lower in smokers than in nonsmokers. The relationships of presence/absence of respiratory symptoms and cigarette smoking with DL(CO)sb and DL/VA was significant. DL(CO) indices were almost always selected as discriminant variables in multivariate analysis between asymptomatic and symptomatic subjects. Poor concordance among lung function tests was evident: in men, 30% with abnormal (i.e., lower than 97.5% percentile) and 21% with normal DL(CO) indices also had abnormal MEFV parameters and/or DN2%/L. In women, the corresponding figures were 24 and 10%, respectively. In men, when considering only DL(CO) indices, the percentage of symptomatic subjects with abnormal lung function tests ranged from 33% in those with at least one symptom to 45% in those complaining of dyspnea. When the proportion of symptomatic subjects with DN2%/L and MEFV abnormalities were added, it increased to 56 and 66%, respectively. However, in women the proportion of symptomatic subjects with abnormal lung function indices was very small. These results indicate the usefulness of including CO diffusing capacity in epidemiologic surveys in the detection of abnormalities.

Carbon monoxide diffusing capacity, other indices of lung function, and respiratory symptoms in a general population sample

Viegi G;
1990

Abstract

To assess the relationships among single-breath diffusing capacity for CO (DL(CO)sb) (13), respiratory symptoms, and cigarette smoking in a general population sample, the data of 718 men and 894 women 20 year of age or older were analyzed, and comparisons were performed with flow-volume curve (MEFV) variables and the slope of the alveolar plateau (DN2%/L) as well. Percent predicted DL(CO)sb and its correction for alveolar volume (DL/VA) were significantly lower in smokers than in nonsmokers. The relationships of presence/absence of respiratory symptoms and cigarette smoking with DL(CO)sb and DL/VA was significant. DL(CO) indices were almost always selected as discriminant variables in multivariate analysis between asymptomatic and symptomatic subjects. Poor concordance among lung function tests was evident: in men, 30% with abnormal (i.e., lower than 97.5% percentile) and 21% with normal DL(CO) indices also had abnormal MEFV parameters and/or DN2%/L. In women, the corresponding figures were 24 and 10%, respectively. In men, when considering only DL(CO) indices, the percentage of symptomatic subjects with abnormal lung function tests ranged from 33% in those with at least one symptom to 45% in those complaining of dyspnea. When the proportion of symptomatic subjects with DN2%/L and MEFV abnormalities were added, it increased to 56 and 66%, respectively. However, in women the proportion of symptomatic subjects with abnormal lung function indices was very small. These results indicate the usefulness of including CO diffusing capacity in epidemiologic surveys in the detection of abnormalities.
1990
Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica - IFC
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_213347-doc_77778.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity, Other Indices of Lung Function, and Respiratory Symptoms in a General Population Sample
Dimensione 841.04 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
841.04 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/176249
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 36
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 40
social impact