Through a historiographic analysis, this contribution surveys the different hypotheses that have been formulated in archaeology and art history: this double focus allows for moving between different scales of analysis ranging from the concept of household production to regionally based production. In particular, in art history, traditional approaches concerning "artistic attribution" or "authorship" have been partially replaced by a new perspective, according to which the intrinsic meaning and content of artworks are now considered the most relevant thread of inquiry.
The Historiography of the Concept of 'Workshop' in Ancient Near Eastern Archaeology: Descriptive Models and Theoretical Approaches (Anthropology vs. Art History)
Di Paolo S
2014
Abstract
Through a historiographic analysis, this contribution surveys the different hypotheses that have been formulated in archaeology and art history: this double focus allows for moving between different scales of analysis ranging from the concept of household production to regionally based production. In particular, in art history, traditional approaches concerning "artistic attribution" or "authorship" have been partially replaced by a new perspective, according to which the intrinsic meaning and content of artworks are now considered the most relevant thread of inquiry.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


