We discuss the relationship between the Dyson-equation method of Wachutka ct al. [J. Phys. Condens. Matter 4, 2831 (1992)] and the embedding method of Inglesfield [J. Phys. C 14, 3795 (1981)] in the Green's-function calculation of a defect in solids. We will show that if the Green's function is expanded using the same basis set, the Green's-function matrix of the embedding method, GE, is related to that of the Dyson-equation method, G(D), by a simple Dyson-type equation G(E) = G(D) + G(D) deltah G(E), where the matrix deltah is related to the incompleteness of the basis set. With the increasing number of basis functions, the Green's functions calculated with the two methods converge to each other rapidly in the interior of the perturbed volume, while they differ persistently on the boundary surface because the Dyson-equation method fails to incorporate the boundary condition of the Green's function. Reflecting this behavior, deltah tends to vanish rather slowly with increasing number of basis functions. To demonstrate this, we perform a numerical calculation using a simplified one-dimensional model.

Comparison of the embedding and Dyson-equation methods in the Green's-function calculation of a defect in solids

Trioni MI
2001

Abstract

We discuss the relationship between the Dyson-equation method of Wachutka ct al. [J. Phys. Condens. Matter 4, 2831 (1992)] and the embedding method of Inglesfield [J. Phys. C 14, 3795 (1981)] in the Green's-function calculation of a defect in solids. We will show that if the Green's function is expanded using the same basis set, the Green's-function matrix of the embedding method, GE, is related to that of the Dyson-equation method, G(D), by a simple Dyson-type equation G(E) = G(D) + G(D) deltah G(E), where the matrix deltah is related to the incompleteness of the basis set. With the increasing number of basis functions, the Green's functions calculated with the two methods converge to each other rapidly in the interior of the perturbed volume, while they differ persistently on the boundary surface because the Dyson-equation method fails to incorporate the boundary condition of the Green's function. Reflecting this behavior, deltah tends to vanish rather slowly with increasing number of basis functions. To demonstrate this, we perform a numerical calculation using a simplified one-dimensional model.
2001
INFM
Electronic-structure
Surfaces
Impurities
Density
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_268648-doc_74687.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Comparison of the embedding and Dyson-equation methods in the Green's-function calculation of a defect in solids
Dimensione 104.3 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
104.3 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/198144
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact