Modern approaches for emergency management promote exchange of information between local authorities and community aiming at more appropriate and effective ways to manage hydro-meteorological risks1. In this framework, risk communication should not only start during the build-up of the hazard, but also in pre-warning and 'peace' time and it contribute to better emergency preparedness. Lately, a rapid growth of interest emerges to enable citizens to inspect hazard-related processes on their territory2. From the risk managers perspective, substantial advantages of taking this citizen-based approach include (1) the opportunity to identify on a quick and 'relatively' low cost basis one or more risk components at different geographical locations and (2) the ability to provide a practical application for citizens interested in creating and communicating useful information toward establishing a better understanding of their territory. From the citizens perspectives, it provides the opportunity to generate benefit through increasing and encouraging interest for self-awareness as well as self-preparedness. However, the use of citizen-based information also bring forth the need to train and establish standardized forms, guidelines and tools, particularly if the data collected seek to be useful information for decision-making activities and emergency management3. In this research work, we address the question on the quality of data collected by volunteers for decision-making activities. This in the framework of the civil protection organization of the Friuli-Venezia-Giulia (CP-FVG) and the Italian study area of the CHANGES project, Municipality of Pontebba4. An experiment is carried out by analyzing the results of a questionnaire form dealing with the inspection of the functional status of check dams and bridges across streams. This form is filled by volunteers (in this case, citizens and university students), that register to a web-portal with access by browser after a standardized training given by practitioners and scientists. During the latter, the guidelines to fill the questionnaire, i.e. various conditions of hydraulic structures and the proposed criteria for quality evaluation5, will be disseminated to the volunteers. The quality of the data are analyzed on the basis of these guidelines in order to determine if the citizens-based data collection approach can be used to prioritize the structures to be inspected by the risk managers.
First level inspection by trained-volunteers of torrent control structures in mountainous catchments: towards a quality-evaluation of data collected
Bossi G;Viero A;Frigerio S;Schenato L;Sterlacchini S;Pasuto A
2013
Abstract
Modern approaches for emergency management promote exchange of information between local authorities and community aiming at more appropriate and effective ways to manage hydro-meteorological risks1. In this framework, risk communication should not only start during the build-up of the hazard, but also in pre-warning and 'peace' time and it contribute to better emergency preparedness. Lately, a rapid growth of interest emerges to enable citizens to inspect hazard-related processes on their territory2. From the risk managers perspective, substantial advantages of taking this citizen-based approach include (1) the opportunity to identify on a quick and 'relatively' low cost basis one or more risk components at different geographical locations and (2) the ability to provide a practical application for citizens interested in creating and communicating useful information toward establishing a better understanding of their territory. From the citizens perspectives, it provides the opportunity to generate benefit through increasing and encouraging interest for self-awareness as well as self-preparedness. However, the use of citizen-based information also bring forth the need to train and establish standardized forms, guidelines and tools, particularly if the data collected seek to be useful information for decision-making activities and emergency management3. In this research work, we address the question on the quality of data collected by volunteers for decision-making activities. This in the framework of the civil protection organization of the Friuli-Venezia-Giulia (CP-FVG) and the Italian study area of the CHANGES project, Municipality of Pontebba4. An experiment is carried out by analyzing the results of a questionnaire form dealing with the inspection of the functional status of check dams and bridges across streams. This form is filled by volunteers (in this case, citizens and university students), that register to a web-portal with access by browser after a standardized training given by practitioners and scientists. During the latter, the guidelines to fill the questionnaire, i.e. various conditions of hydraulic structures and the proposed criteria for quality evaluation5, will be disseminated to the volunteers. The quality of the data are analyzed on the basis of these guidelines in order to determine if the citizens-based data collection approach can be used to prioritize the structures to be inspected by the risk managers.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
prod_258554-doc_70186.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: First level inspection by trained-volunteers of torrent control structures in mountainous catchments: towards a quality-evaluation of data collected
Dimensione
53.5 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
53.5 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.