The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether combined evaluation by discriminant analysis of rest-redistribution thallium-201 tomography and low-dose dobutamine echocardiography enhances the accuracy in identifying viable myocardium in patients with chronic coronary artery disease. Rest-redistribution 201Tl has high sensitivity but low specificity in identifying viable myocardium, while the opposite is true for low-dose dobutamine echocardiography. Forty-six patients underwent low-dose dobutamine echocardiography and rest redistribution 201Tl tomography on the same day. Rest echocardiography was repeated at least 30 days (mean 40 ± 20) after myocardial revascularization. Discriminant analysis was applied to the results of 201Tl tomography and dobutamine echocardiography to classify a/dyskinetic segments as viable or non-viable. In 92 a/dyskinetic segments that were revascularized, rest-redistribution 201Tl tomography yielded an accuracy of 75%, while the accuracy of dobutamine echocardiography was 70% (P < 0.05). When discriminant analysis was used, the combined evaluation gave an accuracy of 83% (P < 0.05 vs both tests). These findings demonstrate that low-dose dobutamine echocardiography and 201Tl imaging are useful and complementary techniques for identifying viable myocardium in patients with chronic coronary artery disease. Combined evaluation by discriminant anal analysis significantly improves accuracy, although the cost-effectiveness of such an approach remains to be determined.

Combined evaluation of rest-redistribution thallium-201 tomography and low-dose dobutamine echocardiography enhances the identification of viable myocardium in patients with chronic coronary artery disease

Mainenti;Pa;
1998

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether combined evaluation by discriminant analysis of rest-redistribution thallium-201 tomography and low-dose dobutamine echocardiography enhances the accuracy in identifying viable myocardium in patients with chronic coronary artery disease. Rest-redistribution 201Tl has high sensitivity but low specificity in identifying viable myocardium, while the opposite is true for low-dose dobutamine echocardiography. Forty-six patients underwent low-dose dobutamine echocardiography and rest redistribution 201Tl tomography on the same day. Rest echocardiography was repeated at least 30 days (mean 40 ± 20) after myocardial revascularization. Discriminant analysis was applied to the results of 201Tl tomography and dobutamine echocardiography to classify a/dyskinetic segments as viable or non-viable. In 92 a/dyskinetic segments that were revascularized, rest-redistribution 201Tl tomography yielded an accuracy of 75%, while the accuracy of dobutamine echocardiography was 70% (P < 0.05). When discriminant analysis was used, the combined evaluation gave an accuracy of 83% (P < 0.05 vs both tests). These findings demonstrate that low-dose dobutamine echocardiography and 201Tl imaging are useful and complementary techniques for identifying viable myocardium in patients with chronic coronary artery disease. Combined evaluation by discriminant anal analysis significantly improves accuracy, although the cost-effectiveness of such an approach remains to be determined.
1998
dobutamine
thallium 201
adult
aged
article
clinical article
clinical trial
controlled study
coronary artery disease
diagnostic accuracy
discriminant analysis
echocardiography
female
heart muscle
heart muscle revascularization
human
intermethod comparison
male
rest
tomography
Adrenergic beta-Agonists
Adult
Aged
Coronary Disease
Dobutamine
Echocardiography
Female
Heart
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Revascularization
Regression Analysis
Stroke Volume
Thallium Radioisotopes
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/210596
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 25
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact