The impact of disruptions in JET became even more important with the replacement of the previous Carbon Fiber Composite (CFC) wall with a more fragile full metal ITER-like wall (ILW). The development of robust disruption mitigation systems is crucial for JET (and also for ITER). Moreover, a reliable real-time (RT) disruption predictor is a pre-requisite to any mitigation method. The Advance Predictor Of DISruptions (APODIS) has been installed in the JET Real-Time Data Network (RTDN) for the RT recognition of disruptions. The predictor operates with the new ILW but it has been trained only with discharges belonging to campaigns with the CFC wall. 7 real-time signals are used to characterize the plasma status (disruptive or non-disruptive) at regular intervals of 32 ms. After the first 3 JET ILW campaigns (991 discharges), the success rate of the predictor is 98.36% (alarms are triggered in average 426 ms before the disruptions). The false alarm and missed alarm rates are 0.92% and 1.64%.

Results of the JET real-time disruption predictor in the ITER-like wall campaigns

Andrea Murari;
2013

Abstract

The impact of disruptions in JET became even more important with the replacement of the previous Carbon Fiber Composite (CFC) wall with a more fragile full metal ITER-like wall (ILW). The development of robust disruption mitigation systems is crucial for JET (and also for ITER). Moreover, a reliable real-time (RT) disruption predictor is a pre-requisite to any mitigation method. The Advance Predictor Of DISruptions (APODIS) has been installed in the JET Real-Time Data Network (RTDN) for the RT recognition of disruptions. The predictor operates with the new ILW but it has been trained only with discharges belonging to campaigns with the CFC wall. 7 real-time signals are used to characterize the plasma status (disruptive or non-disruptive) at regular intervals of 32 ms. After the first 3 JET ILW campaigns (991 discharges), the success rate of the predictor is 98.36% (alarms are triggered in average 426 ms before the disruptions). The false alarm and missed alarm rates are 0.92% and 1.64%.
2013
Istituto gas ionizzati - IGI - Sede Padova
Inglese
88
6-8
1228
1231
4
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920379613002974
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
APODIS
Disruption prediction
ITER
ITER-like wall
JET
This work, supported by the European Commu- nities under the contract of Association between EURATOM/CIEMAT/CCFE/ENEA/IST, was carried out within the framework of the European Fusion Development Agreement. "Funding under Association Contract FU07-CT-2007-00053". / E-ISSN: 1873-7196.
1
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Jesús Vega; Sebastián DormidoCanto; Juan M. López; Andrea Murari; Jesús M. Ramírez; Raúl Moreno; Mariano Ruiz; Diogo Alves; Robert Felton; JETEFDA Con...espandi
01 Contributo su Rivista::01.01 Articolo in rivista
none
   EU Fusion for ITER Applications
   EUFORIA
   FP7
   211804
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/212007
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 104
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 92
social impact