Using the Weight of Evidence model (WofE), a groundwater vulnerability assessment to nitrate (NO3-) contamination has been performed considering both positive and negative evidences of contamination in the aquifer of the Province of Milan (Northern Italy). The WofE calculates the weighted relationship between hydrogeological-anthropogenic factors (explanatory variables) that influence the aquifer vulnerability and groundwater nitrate concentration in the wells used as training points (response variable). The use of the model requires to express the response variable as binary with the necessity to establish a threshold value of concentration which separates the data set in two subsets. The conventional approach is to use only the subsets containing wells with concentration higher than the threshold value as training points. In fact in groundwater vulnerability problems this subset represents the number and location of the events that is, where groundwater has been strongly impacted by contamination. A limit of this approach is that an entire subset, the one individuating areas where groundwater has been slightly or no impacted by contamination, is completely neglected. In this study the threshold value of concentration has been calculated by simple statistical analysis and both the subsets of data served as training points to run two different WofE models. This allows to avoid losing important information on experimental data and to better describe the aquifer vulnerability by directly considering the importance of factors which are related not only to high values of groundwater contamination but also to low values. The influence in the final outputs due to the use of the two different training point sets has been evaluated comparing the spatial distribution of the resulting vulnerability classes. For both models the obtained weighted relationships between the explanatory variables and response variable have also been investigated highlighting the main difference in the results.
Using positive and negative evidences of contamination to evaluate groundwater vulnerability
Sterlacchini S
2009
Abstract
Using the Weight of Evidence model (WofE), a groundwater vulnerability assessment to nitrate (NO3-) contamination has been performed considering both positive and negative evidences of contamination in the aquifer of the Province of Milan (Northern Italy). The WofE calculates the weighted relationship between hydrogeological-anthropogenic factors (explanatory variables) that influence the aquifer vulnerability and groundwater nitrate concentration in the wells used as training points (response variable). The use of the model requires to express the response variable as binary with the necessity to establish a threshold value of concentration which separates the data set in two subsets. The conventional approach is to use only the subsets containing wells with concentration higher than the threshold value as training points. In fact in groundwater vulnerability problems this subset represents the number and location of the events that is, where groundwater has been strongly impacted by contamination. A limit of this approach is that an entire subset, the one individuating areas where groundwater has been slightly or no impacted by contamination, is completely neglected. In this study the threshold value of concentration has been calculated by simple statistical analysis and both the subsets of data served as training points to run two different WofE models. This allows to avoid losing important information on experimental data and to better describe the aquifer vulnerability by directly considering the importance of factors which are related not only to high values of groundwater contamination but also to low values. The influence in the final outputs due to the use of the two different training point sets has been evaluated comparing the spatial distribution of the resulting vulnerability classes. For both models the obtained weighted relationships between the explanatory variables and response variable have also been investigated highlighting the main difference in the results.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
