This letter addresses the stability problem of two auxiliary differential equation (ADE) finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) methods for the case of modified Lorentz media, using the combination of the von Neumann method and the Routh-Hurwitz criterion. A rigorous investigation supported by FDTD simulations designates that the stability criterion of the conventional FDTD method can be preserved via the proper selection of the difference and averaging operators. A set of conditions for the dispersive medium parameters is derived, providing the stability limit for both FDTD schemes with practical guidelines for evaluating the fitting of experimentally studied materials.

Investigation of the Stability of ADE-FDTD Methods for Modified Lorentz Media

Zografopoulos Dimitrios C
2014

Abstract

This letter addresses the stability problem of two auxiliary differential equation (ADE) finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) methods for the case of modified Lorentz media, using the combination of the von Neumann method and the Routh-Hurwitz criterion. A rigorous investigation supported by FDTD simulations designates that the stability criterion of the conventional FDTD method can be preserved via the proper selection of the difference and averaging operators. A set of conditions for the dispersive medium parameters is derived, providing the stability limit for both FDTD schemes with practical guidelines for evaluating the fitting of experimentally studied materials.
2014
Istituto per la Microelettronica e Microsistemi - IMM
Auxiliary differential equations
dispersive media
finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method
stability
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/226601
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 29
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 27
social impact