We study the phase diagram of the t-J model using a mean field type approximation within the Baym-Kadanoff perturbation expansion for Hubbard X operators. The line separating the normal state from a d-wave Bur or bond-order state starts near optimal doping at T=0 and rises quickly with decreasing doping. The transition temperature T-c for d-wave superconductivity increases monotonically in the overdoped region towards optimal doping. Near optimal doping a strong competition between the two d-wave order parameters sets in leading to a strong suppression of T-c in the underdoped region. Treating for simplicity the Bur phase as commensurate the superconducting and flux phases coexist in the underdoped region below T-c, whereas a pure flux phase exists above T-c with a pseudogap of d-wave symmetry An the excitation spectrum. We also find that incommensurate charge-density-wave ground states due to Coulomb interactions do not modify strongly the above phase diagram near the superconducting phase, at least, as long as the latter exists at all.
Interplay between superconductivity and flux phase in the t-J model
Cappelluti E;
1999
Abstract
We study the phase diagram of the t-J model using a mean field type approximation within the Baym-Kadanoff perturbation expansion for Hubbard X operators. The line separating the normal state from a d-wave Bur or bond-order state starts near optimal doping at T=0 and rises quickly with decreasing doping. The transition temperature T-c for d-wave superconductivity increases monotonically in the overdoped region towards optimal doping. Near optimal doping a strong competition between the two d-wave order parameters sets in leading to a strong suppression of T-c in the underdoped region. Treating for simplicity the Bur phase as commensurate the superconducting and flux phases coexist in the underdoped region below T-c, whereas a pure flux phase exists above T-c with a pseudogap of d-wave symmetry An the excitation spectrum. We also find that incommensurate charge-density-wave ground states due to Coulomb interactions do not modify strongly the above phase diagram near the superconducting phase, at least, as long as the latter exists at all.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


