The relevance of simulation methods for the assessment and the analysis of exterior noise in the automotive and truck industry is likely to increase in the fore-coming years, due to the announced revision of the ISO 362 regulation as well as to the strong increase in the variety of options offered to automotive and truck OEMs. That, in particular, for what concerns the definition of the sound package in the engine bay, that forces them to look with interest at methodologies that allow making concept decisions (e.g. which concept to use for an absorber or where to put the shields under a truck's cabin) already in the design phase. This article describes a numerical/experimental activity aimed at comparing the performance of two deterministic simulation methods, namely the Boundary Elements (BE) method and the Automatically Matched Layer (AML) method. The objective of the simulations consists in evaluating the exterior Acoustic Transfer Functions of a simplified (but not trivial) vehicle engine bay mock-up in a broad frequency range up to 3.5 kHz. The capabilities of the analysis methods of well representing the effect of both acoustic trim parts and apertures positioning around the engine bay has been checked. The methods' computational efficiency has been evaluated and compared in detail, as well as the accuracy of the results, by correlating with experimental data.

BEM & FEM-IFEM modeling and analysis methods for high complexity vehicle models

Miccoli G;
2012

Abstract

The relevance of simulation methods for the assessment and the analysis of exterior noise in the automotive and truck industry is likely to increase in the fore-coming years, due to the announced revision of the ISO 362 regulation as well as to the strong increase in the variety of options offered to automotive and truck OEMs. That, in particular, for what concerns the definition of the sound package in the engine bay, that forces them to look with interest at methodologies that allow making concept decisions (e.g. which concept to use for an absorber or where to put the shields under a truck's cabin) already in the design phase. This article describes a numerical/experimental activity aimed at comparing the performance of two deterministic simulation methods, namely the Boundary Elements (BE) method and the Automatically Matched Layer (AML) method. The objective of the simulations consists in evaluating the exterior Acoustic Transfer Functions of a simplified (but not trivial) vehicle engine bay mock-up in a broad frequency range up to 3.5 kHz. The capabilities of the analysis methods of well representing the effect of both acoustic trim parts and apertures positioning around the engine bay has been checked. The methods' computational efficiency has been evaluated and compared in detail, as well as the accuracy of the results, by correlating with experimental data.
2012
Istituto per le Macchine Agricole e Movimento Terra - IMAMOTER - Sede Ferrara
Inglese
Proceedings of the ISMA 2012 Noise and Vibration Engineering Conference
ISMA 2012 Noise and Vibration Engineering Conference
4155
4168
9789073802896
No
17-19 September 2012
Leuven, Belgium
BEM
FEM
IFEM
simulation
vehicle
high complexity models
3
none
Miccoli, G; Nizzoli, T; Bertolini, C
273
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
04 Contributo in convegno::04.01 Contributo in Atti di convegno
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/240666
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact