Background: Diagnosis of partial anomalous pulmonary venous return is usually suspected by echo- cardiography and often confirmed by cardiac catheterization. Magnetic resonance imaging is a powerful non-invasive diagnostic tool that can give accurate insight on systemic and pulmonary veins, cardiac anatomy and physiopathology. Aim: To test the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance in patient with suspected partial anomalous pulmonary venous return. Case presentation: Twenty consecutive pa- tients (10 male, mean age: 27±20 years) with suspected partial anomalous pulmonary venous return underwent a magnetic resonance study comprehensive of Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography and phase-velocity-contrast in order to evaluate pulmonary and sys- temic venous anatomy and QP/QS. In 14 of them a cardiac catheterization was also performed. Anatomy findings and QP/QS result of both exams were compared. Sixteen patients underwent surgical correction. In the other four patients with QP/QS<1.5, surgical correction was not indicated according to the literature (1). Among patient which performed both magnetic resonance and cardiac catheterization (14 patients) anatomy findings were concordant in 12 of them. In all operated patients, surgical findings were concordant with MRI report. There was a good correlation between magnetic resonance and cardiac catheterization QP/QS evaluation (mean value 2.23 and 2.4, respectively). Conclusion: In patients with suspected anomalous pulmonary venous return, magnetic resonance provides a comprehensive evaluation of pulmonary venous return and the amount of shunt, overcoming most of the limitations of echocar- diography. Therefore magnetic resonance is a powerful diagnostic tool for indicating therapeutic man- agement and surgical strategies for this group of patients, and can be considered a non-invasive alternative to cardiac catheterization.

Magnetic resonance imaging is the diagnostic tool of choice in the preoperative evaluation of patients with partial anomalous pulmonary venous return

Lamia AitAli;
2006

Abstract

Background: Diagnosis of partial anomalous pulmonary venous return is usually suspected by echo- cardiography and often confirmed by cardiac catheterization. Magnetic resonance imaging is a powerful non-invasive diagnostic tool that can give accurate insight on systemic and pulmonary veins, cardiac anatomy and physiopathology. Aim: To test the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance in patient with suspected partial anomalous pulmonary venous return. Case presentation: Twenty consecutive pa- tients (10 male, mean age: 27±20 years) with suspected partial anomalous pulmonary venous return underwent a magnetic resonance study comprehensive of Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography and phase-velocity-contrast in order to evaluate pulmonary and sys- temic venous anatomy and QP/QS. In 14 of them a cardiac catheterization was also performed. Anatomy findings and QP/QS result of both exams were compared. Sixteen patients underwent surgical correction. In the other four patients with QP/QS<1.5, surgical correction was not indicated according to the literature (1). Among patient which performed both magnetic resonance and cardiac catheterization (14 patients) anatomy findings were concordant in 12 of them. In all operated patients, surgical findings were concordant with MRI report. There was a good correlation between magnetic resonance and cardiac catheterization QP/QS evaluation (mean value 2.23 and 2.4, respectively). Conclusion: In patients with suspected anomalous pulmonary venous return, magnetic resonance provides a comprehensive evaluation of pulmonary venous return and the amount of shunt, overcoming most of the limitations of echocar- diography. Therefore magnetic resonance is a powerful diagnostic tool for indicating therapeutic man- agement and surgical strategies for this group of patients, and can be considered a non-invasive alternative to cardiac catheterization.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/243581
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 61
social impact