tThe present study has provided a comparison between a conventional ex situ method for the treatmentof contaminated soil, a soil slurry bioreactor, with a novel technology in which a contaminant is rapidlyand effectively removed from the soil by means of absorptive polymer beads, which are then added to atwo-phase partitioning bioreactor (TPPB) for biodegradation of the target molecule. 4-nitrophenol (4NP)was selected as a model contaminant, being representative of a large class of xenobiotics, and the DuPontthermoplastic HytrelTM8206 was utilized for its extraction from soil over ranges of soil contaminationlevel, soil moisture content, and polymer:soil ratios. Since the polymers were able to rapidly (up to77% and 85% in 4 and 24 h respectively) and selectively remove the contaminant, the soil retained itsnutrient and microflora content, which is in contrast to soil washing which can remove these valuablesoil resources. After 4 h of reaction time, the TPPB system demonstrated removal efficiency four timeshigher (77% vs 20%) than the slurry system, with expected concomitant savings in time and energy. Avolumetric removal rate of 75 mg4NP h-1L-1was obtained in the TPPB, significantly greater than thevalue of 1.7 obtained in the slurry bioreactor. The polymers were readily regenerated for subsequentreuse, demonstrating the versatility of the polymer-based soil treatment technology.

Ex situ remediation of polluted soils by absorptive polymers, and acomparison of slurry and two-phase partitioning bioreactors forultimate contaminant degradation

Tomei MC;Mosca Angelucci D;
2013

Abstract

tThe present study has provided a comparison between a conventional ex situ method for the treatmentof contaminated soil, a soil slurry bioreactor, with a novel technology in which a contaminant is rapidlyand effectively removed from the soil by means of absorptive polymer beads, which are then added to atwo-phase partitioning bioreactor (TPPB) for biodegradation of the target molecule. 4-nitrophenol (4NP)was selected as a model contaminant, being representative of a large class of xenobiotics, and the DuPontthermoplastic HytrelTM8206 was utilized for its extraction from soil over ranges of soil contaminationlevel, soil moisture content, and polymer:soil ratios. Since the polymers were able to rapidly (up to77% and 85% in 4 and 24 h respectively) and selectively remove the contaminant, the soil retained itsnutrient and microflora content, which is in contrast to soil washing which can remove these valuablesoil resources. After 4 h of reaction time, the TPPB system demonstrated removal efficiency four timeshigher (77% vs 20%) than the slurry system, with expected concomitant savings in time and energy. Avolumetric removal rate of 75 mg4NP h-1L-1was obtained in the TPPB, significantly greater than thevalue of 1.7 obtained in the slurry bioreactor. The polymers were readily regenerated for subsequentreuse, demonstrating the versatility of the polymer-based soil treatment technology.
2013
Istituto di Ricerca Sulle Acque - IRSA
Inglese
262
31
37
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
Ex situ soil bioremediation
Absorptive polymers
Two-phase partitioning bioreactors
4
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Tomei, Mc; Mosca Angelucci, D; Annesini, Mc; Daugulis, Aj
01 Contributo su Rivista::01.01 Articolo in rivista
none
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/249350
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact