In this paper are presented comparisons of SPH variants on academic test cases classically used to validate numerical fluid dynamics software. These comparisons are extracted from NextMuSE FP7 project activities which will be published more extensively in the near future. One of the goals of this project was to better understand the SPH method and to leave the path to its establishment within CFD methods. An important work load was thus dedicated to benchmark SPH variants on selected test cases. A number of results and conclusions of this comparative study are presented in this paper. The studied variants are: standard weekly-compressible SPH, ?-SPH, Riemann-SPH, incompressible SPH, and FVPM. The majority of the test cases also present a reference solution, either experimental or computed using a mesh-based solver. Test cases include: wave propagation, flow past a cylinder, jet impact, floating body, bubble rise, dam break on obstacle, floating body dynamics, etc. Conclusions may help SPH practitioners to choose one variant or another and shall give detailed understanding necessary to derive further improvements of the method.

Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics: Benchmarking on Selected Test Cases Within the NextMuSE Initiative

Andrea Colagrossi;Salvatore Marrone;
2013

Abstract

In this paper are presented comparisons of SPH variants on academic test cases classically used to validate numerical fluid dynamics software. These comparisons are extracted from NextMuSE FP7 project activities which will be published more extensively in the near future. One of the goals of this project was to better understand the SPH method and to leave the path to its establishment within CFD methods. An important work load was thus dedicated to benchmark SPH variants on selected test cases. A number of results and conclusions of this comparative study are presented in this paper. The studied variants are: standard weekly-compressible SPH, ?-SPH, Riemann-SPH, incompressible SPH, and FVPM. The majority of the test cases also present a reference solution, either experimental or computed using a mesh-based solver. Test cases include: wave propagation, flow past a cylinder, jet impact, floating body, bubble rise, dam break on obstacle, floating body dynamics, etc. Conclusions may help SPH practitioners to choose one variant or another and shall give detailed understanding necessary to derive further improvements of the method.
2013
Istituto di iNgegneria del Mare - INM (ex INSEAN)
Inglese
ASME 2013 32nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
32nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering OMAE2013
7
978-0-7918-5541-6
http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1786648
ASME-American Society Of Mechanical Engineers
New York
STATI UNITI D'AMERICA
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
June 9-14, 2013
Nantes, France
2
none
David le Touzé ; Daniel A. Barcarolo; Matthieu Kerhuel; Guillaume Oger; Nicolas Grenier; Nathan Quinlan; Libor Lobovsky; Mihai Basa; Francis Leboeuf; ...espandi
273
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
04 Contributo in convegno::04.01 Contributo in Atti di convegno
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/249374
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact