Assessing the skeletal response to enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) in Gaucher disease (GD) is problematic. We investigated the reliability of Tc-99m-sestamibi scintigraphy in monitoring changes in bone marrow involvement induced by ERT. Methods: In 52 GD patients, the efficacy of ERT on bone marrow disease was monitored using at least 2 sequential Tc-99m-sestamibi scans; 17 patients were receiving ERT at enrollment, and 35 were ERT-naive. We elaborated a dose-response model by statistical analysis based on linear mixed models. Results: Patients whose marrow disease improved had received a significantly higher ERT dose per month than patients who did not improve. Significantly more patients reached near-disappearance of marrow disease if their disease burden at enrollment had been lower and the duration of clinical signs shorter. The response of the marrow scintigraphic score was more pronounced in ERT-naive patients. No relevant effect of ERT on marrow disease was observed until platelet count and splenomegaly had improved. Conclusion: Although based on localized evaluation, changes in the Tc-99m-sestamibi score closely correlated with the main determinants of ERT, with a definite dose-response relationship. The threshold at which ERT induced any improvement in bone marrow disease was 35-36 U/kg/mo; in ERT-naive patients, the scintigraphic score declined by 1 unit after ERT at 28 U/kg/mo.

Tc-99m-Sestamibi Scintigraphy to Monitor the Long-Term Efficacy of Enzyme Replacement Therapy on Bone Marrow Infiltration in Patients with Gaucher Disease

Minichilli Fabrizio;Pierini Anna;
2013

Abstract

Assessing the skeletal response to enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) in Gaucher disease (GD) is problematic. We investigated the reliability of Tc-99m-sestamibi scintigraphy in monitoring changes in bone marrow involvement induced by ERT. Methods: In 52 GD patients, the efficacy of ERT on bone marrow disease was monitored using at least 2 sequential Tc-99m-sestamibi scans; 17 patients were receiving ERT at enrollment, and 35 were ERT-naive. We elaborated a dose-response model by statistical analysis based on linear mixed models. Results: Patients whose marrow disease improved had received a significantly higher ERT dose per month than patients who did not improve. Significantly more patients reached near-disappearance of marrow disease if their disease burden at enrollment had been lower and the duration of clinical signs shorter. The response of the marrow scintigraphic score was more pronounced in ERT-naive patients. No relevant effect of ERT on marrow disease was observed until platelet count and splenomegaly had improved. Conclusion: Although based on localized evaluation, changes in the Tc-99m-sestamibi score closely correlated with the main determinants of ERT, with a definite dose-response relationship. The threshold at which ERT induced any improvement in bone marrow disease was 35-36 U/kg/mo; in ERT-naive patients, the scintigraphic score declined by 1 unit after ERT at 28 U/kg/mo.
2013
Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica - IFC
Inglese
54
10
1717
1724
8
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23990684
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
Tc-99m-sestamibi
Gaucher disease
bone marrow disease
scintigraphic score
enzyme replacement therapy
11
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Erba Paola, A; Minichilli, Fabrizio; Giona, Fiorina; Linari, Silvia; Dambrosia, James; Pierini, Anna; Filocamo, Mirella; Di Rocco, Maja; Buffoni, Ferd...espandi
01 Contributo su Rivista::01.01 Articolo in rivista
reserved
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_311703-doc_91066.pdf

non disponibili

Descrizione: articolo pubblicato
Dimensione 844.97 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
844.97 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/253525
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact