The aim of this work was to carry out a genotoxic monitoring on small rodents living in protected areas to determine the baseline values and to establish if some of these areas may be used as reference points for successive genotoxic monitoring. To this purpose, peripheral blood micronucleus test was applied for the first time to a high number of free living rodents (N=500). Six protected areas, located in the Centre of Italy, were studied. In total 241 Apodemus sylvaticus, and 259 Apodemus flavicollis were analysed. Results obtained show that the mean frequency of micronucleated erythrocytes is lower than the threshold value ( ME/1000E) established for laboratory mice. Micronuclei frequency and the percentage of animals with ME/1000E e 2 are significantly (p < 0.001) higher in A. sylvaticus living in “Castelporziano” Estate and in “Circeo” National Park than in those living in “Lago di Penne” Regional Natural Reserve and “Lucretili Mountains”. Similar results were obtained in A. flavicollis. Animals living in “Castelporziano” Estate show micronuclei frequency and percentage of individuals with ME/1000E e 2 significantly higher (p < 0.005) than mice from “Gran Sasso -Laga” National Park and “Lago di Penne” Regional Natural Reserve. In conclusion, data obtained indicate that “Castelporziano” Estate and “Circeo” National Park are exposed to non negligible genotoxic impact. Results may be the basis for a genotoxic monitoring w ich has to be performed applying, at regular intervals, peripheral blood micronucleus test also in animals living in protected areas. This study highlights the need to consider the risk of environmental contamination inside the protected areas, to understand the related problems and, consequently, to carry out an adequate management and control program of the territory.

Genotoxic monitoring on wild rodents living in protected areas

2010

Abstract

The aim of this work was to carry out a genotoxic monitoring on small rodents living in protected areas to determine the baseline values and to establish if some of these areas may be used as reference points for successive genotoxic monitoring. To this purpose, peripheral blood micronucleus test was applied for the first time to a high number of free living rodents (N=500). Six protected areas, located in the Centre of Italy, were studied. In total 241 Apodemus sylvaticus, and 259 Apodemus flavicollis were analysed. Results obtained show that the mean frequency of micronucleated erythrocytes is lower than the threshold value ( ME/1000E) established for laboratory mice. Micronuclei frequency and the percentage of animals with ME/1000E e 2 are significantly (p < 0.001) higher in A. sylvaticus living in “Castelporziano” Estate and in “Circeo” National Park than in those living in “Lago di Penne” Regional Natural Reserve and “Lucretili Mountains”. Similar results were obtained in A. flavicollis. Animals living in “Castelporziano” Estate show micronuclei frequency and percentage of individuals with ME/1000E e 2 significantly higher (p < 0.005) than mice from “Gran Sasso -Laga” National Park and “Lago di Penne” Regional Natural Reserve. In conclusion, data obtained indicate that “Castelporziano” Estate and “Circeo” National Park are exposed to non negligible genotoxic impact. Results may be the basis for a genotoxic monitoring w ich has to be performed applying, at regular intervals, peripheral blood micronucleus test also in animals living in protected areas. This study highlights the need to consider the risk of environmental contamination inside the protected areas, to understand the related problems and, consequently, to carry out an adequate management and control program of the territory.
2010
Istituto di Ricerca sugli Ecosistemi Terrestri - IRET
Apodemus
mutagenesis
micronucleus test
anthropic impact
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/25867
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact