This study uses a generalized additive mixed-effects regression model to predict lexical differences in Tuscan dialects with respect to standard Italian. We used lexical information for 170 concepts used by 2,060 speakers in 213 locations in Tuscany. In our model, geographical position was found to be an important predictor, with locations more distant from Florence having lexical forms more likely to differ from standard Italian. In addition, the geographical pattern varied significantly for low- versus high-frequency concepts and older versus younger speakers. Younger speakers generally used variants more likely to match the standard language. Several other factors emerged as significant. Male speakers as well as farmers were more likely to use lexical forms different from standard Italian. In contrast, higher-educated speakers used lexical forms more likely to match the standard. The model also indicates that lexical variants used in smaller communities are more likely to differ from standard Italian. The impact of community size, however, varied from concept to concept. For a majority of concepts, lexical variants used in smaller communities are more likely to differ from the standard Italian form. For a minority of concepts, however, lexical variants used in larger communities are more likely to differ from standard Italian. Similarly, the effect of the other community- and speaker-related predictors varied per concept. These results clearly show that the model succeeds in teasing apart different forces influencing the dialect landscape and helps us to shed light on the complex interaction between the standard Italian language and the Tuscan dialectal varieties. In addition, this study illustrates the potential of generalized additive mixed-effects regression modeling applied to dialect data.*

Lexical differences between Tuscan dialects and standard Italian: Accounting for geographic and socio-demographic variation using generalized additive mixed modeling

Montemagni Simonetta;
2014

Abstract

This study uses a generalized additive mixed-effects regression model to predict lexical differences in Tuscan dialects with respect to standard Italian. We used lexical information for 170 concepts used by 2,060 speakers in 213 locations in Tuscany. In our model, geographical position was found to be an important predictor, with locations more distant from Florence having lexical forms more likely to differ from standard Italian. In addition, the geographical pattern varied significantly for low- versus high-frequency concepts and older versus younger speakers. Younger speakers generally used variants more likely to match the standard language. Several other factors emerged as significant. Male speakers as well as farmers were more likely to use lexical forms different from standard Italian. In contrast, higher-educated speakers used lexical forms more likely to match the standard. The model also indicates that lexical variants used in smaller communities are more likely to differ from standard Italian. The impact of community size, however, varied from concept to concept. For a majority of concepts, lexical variants used in smaller communities are more likely to differ from the standard Italian form. For a minority of concepts, however, lexical variants used in larger communities are more likely to differ from standard Italian. Similarly, the effect of the other community- and speaker-related predictors varied per concept. These results clearly show that the model succeeds in teasing apart different forces influencing the dialect landscape and helps us to shed light on the complex interaction between the standard Italian language and the Tuscan dialectal varieties. In addition, this study illustrates the potential of generalized additive mixed-effects regression modeling applied to dialect data.*
Campo DC Valore Lingua
dc.authority.ancejournal LANGUAGE -
dc.authority.orgunit Istituto di linguistica computazionale "Antonio Zampolli" - ILC -
dc.authority.people Wieling Martijn it
dc.authority.people Montemagni Simonetta it
dc.authority.people Nerbonne John it
dc.authority.people Baayen R Harald it
dc.collection.id.s b3f88f24-048a-4e43-8ab1-6697b90e068e *
dc.collection.name 01.01 Articolo in rivista *
dc.contributor.appartenenza Istituto di linguistica computazionale "Antonio Zampolli" - ILC *
dc.contributor.appartenenza.mi 918 *
dc.date.accessioned 2024/02/18 04:27:01 -
dc.date.available 2024/02/18 04:27:01 -
dc.date.issued 2014 -
dc.description.abstracteng This study uses a generalized additive mixed-effects regression model to predict lexical differences in Tuscan dialects with respect to standard Italian. We used lexical information for 170 concepts used by 2,060 speakers in 213 locations in Tuscany. In our model, geographical position was found to be an important predictor, with locations more distant from Florence having lexical forms more likely to differ from standard Italian. In addition, the geographical pattern varied significantly for low- versus high-frequency concepts and older versus younger speakers. Younger speakers generally used variants more likely to match the standard language. Several other factors emerged as significant. Male speakers as well as farmers were more likely to use lexical forms different from standard Italian. In contrast, higher-educated speakers used lexical forms more likely to match the standard. The model also indicates that lexical variants used in smaller communities are more likely to differ from standard Italian. The impact of community size, however, varied from concept to concept. For a majority of concepts, lexical variants used in smaller communities are more likely to differ from the standard Italian form. For a minority of concepts, however, lexical variants used in larger communities are more likely to differ from standard Italian. Similarly, the effect of the other community- and speaker-related predictors varied per concept. These results clearly show that the model succeeds in teasing apart different forces influencing the dialect landscape and helps us to shed light on the complex interaction between the standard Italian language and the Tuscan dialectal varieties. In addition, this study illustrates the potential of generalized additive mixed-effects regression modeling applied to dialect data.* -
dc.description.affiliations University of Groningen; Eberhard Karls University of Tubingen; ILC-CNR; University of Freiburg; University of Alberta -
dc.description.allpeople Wieling, Martijn; Montemagni, Simonetta; Nerbonne, John; Baayen, R. Harald -
dc.description.allpeopleoriginal Wieling, Martijn; Montemagni, Simonetta; Nerbonne, John; Baayen, R. Harald -
dc.description.fulltext none en
dc.description.numberofauthors 1 -
dc.identifier.isi WOS:000341904400005 -
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/260804 -
dc.identifier.url http://www.linguisticsociety.org/files/wieling.pdf -
dc.language.iso eng -
dc.relation.firstpage 669 -
dc.relation.issue 3 -
dc.relation.lastpage 692 -
dc.relation.numberofpages 24 -
dc.relation.volume 90 -
dc.subject.keywords Tuscan dialects -
dc.subject.keywords lexical variation -
dc.subject.keywords gene -
dc.subject.keywords mixed-effects regression modeling -
dc.subject.keywords geographical variation -
dc.subject.singlekeyword Tuscan dialects *
dc.subject.singlekeyword lexical variation *
dc.subject.singlekeyword gene *
dc.subject.singlekeyword mixed-effects regression modeling *
dc.subject.singlekeyword geographical variation *
dc.title Lexical differences between Tuscan dialects and standard Italian: Accounting for geographic and socio-demographic variation using generalized additive mixed modeling en
dc.type.driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article -
dc.type.full 01 Contributo su Rivista::01.01 Articolo in rivista it
dc.type.miur 262 -
dc.type.referee Sì, ma tipo non specificato -
dc.ugov.descaux1 285543 -
iris.isi.extIssued 2014 -
iris.isi.extTitle LEXICAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN TUSCAN DIALECTS AND STANDARD ITALIAN: ACCOUNTING FOR GEOGRAPHIC AND SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC VARIATION USING GENERALIZED ADDITIVE MIXED MODELING -
iris.orcid.lastModifiedDate 2024/03/02 00:42:31 *
iris.orcid.lastModifiedMillisecond 1709336551956 *
iris.sitodocente.maxattempts 2 -
isi.authority.ancejournal LANGUAGE###0097-8507 *
isi.category OT *
isi.category OY *
isi.contributor.affiliation University of Groningen -
isi.contributor.affiliation Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR) -
isi.contributor.affiliation University of Groningen -
isi.contributor.affiliation Eberhard Karls University of Tubingen -
isi.contributor.country Netherlands -
isi.contributor.country Italy -
isi.contributor.country Netherlands -
isi.contributor.country Germany -
isi.contributor.name Martijn -
isi.contributor.name Simonetta -
isi.contributor.name John -
isi.contributor.name R. Harald -
isi.contributor.researcherId AAA-2462-2019 -
isi.contributor.researcherId B-8000-2015 -
isi.contributor.researcherId Y-8741-2019 -
isi.contributor.researcherId FZO-2305-2022 -
isi.contributor.subaffiliation -
isi.contributor.subaffiliation Ist Linguist Computat Antonio Zampolli -
isi.contributor.subaffiliation -
isi.contributor.subaffiliation -
isi.contributor.surname Wieling -
isi.contributor.surname Montemagni -
isi.contributor.surname Nerbonne -
isi.contributor.surname Baayen -
isi.date.issued 2014 *
isi.description.abstracteng This study uses a generalized additive mixed-effects regression model to predict lexical differences in Tuscan dialects with respect to standard Italian. We used lexical information for 170 concepts used by 2,060 speakers in 213 locations in Tuscany. In our model, geographical position was found to be an important predictor, with locations more distant from Florence having lexical forms more likely to differ from standard Italian. In addition, the geographical pattern varied significantly for low- versus high-frequency concepts and older versus younger speakers. Younger speakers generally used variants more likely to match the standard language. Several other factors emerged as significant. Male speakers as well as farmers were more likely to use lexical forms different from standard Italian. In contrast, higher-educated speakers used lexical forms more likely to match the standard. The model also indicates that lexical variants used in smaller communities are more likely to differ from standard Italian. The impact of community size, however, varied from concept to concept. For a majority of concepts, lexical variants used in smaller communities are more likely to differ from the standard Italian form. For a minority of concepts, however, lexical variants used in larger communities are more likely to differ from standard Italian. Similarly, the effect of the other community- and speaker-related predictors varied per concept. These results clearly show that the model succeeds in teasing apart different forces influencing the dialect landscape and helps us to shed light on the complex interaction between the standard Italian language and the Tuscan dialectal varieties. In addition, this study illustrates the potential of generalized additive mixed-effects regression modeling applied to dialect data.* *
isi.description.allpeopleoriginal Wieling, M; Montemagni, S; Nerbonne, J; Baayen, RH; *
isi.document.sourcetype WOS.SSCI *
isi.document.type Article *
isi.document.types Article *
isi.identifier.eissn 1535-0665 *
isi.identifier.isi WOS:000341904400005 *
isi.journal.journaltitle LANGUAGE *
isi.journal.journaltitleabbrev LANGUAGE *
isi.language.original English *
isi.publisher.place 1325 18TH ST NW, SUITE 211, WASHINGTON, DC 20036-6501 USA *
isi.relation.firstpage 669 *
isi.relation.issue 3 *
isi.relation.lastpage 692 *
isi.relation.volume 90 *
isi.title LEXICAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN TUSCAN DIALECTS AND STANDARD ITALIAN: ACCOUNTING FOR GEOGRAPHIC AND SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC VARIATION USING GENERALIZED ADDITIVE MIXED MODELING *
Appare nelle tipologie: 01.01 Articolo in rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/260804
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 54
social impact