With the increasing availability of multi-unit recordings the focus of attention starts to shift from bivariate methods towards methods that provide the possibility to study patterns of activity across many neurons. Measures of multi-neuron spike train synchrony are becoming indispensable tools for addressing issues such as network synchronization, spike timing reliability and neuronal coding. However, many multi-neuron synchrony measures are extensions of bivariate measures. Two of the most prominent bivariate approaches are the spike train metrics by Victor-Purpura and van Rossum [1,2]. The former evaluates the cost needed to transform one spike train into the other using only certain elementary steps [1], while the latter measures the Euclidean distance between the two spike trains after convolution of the spikes with an exponential function [2]. Both methods involve one parameter that sets the time scale. In contrast, a more recent bivariate approach, the ISI-distance [3], is time scale independent and self-adaptive. Another essential difference is that the ISI-distance relies on the relative length of interspike intervals (ISI) and not on the timing of spikes. Finally, this method also allows the visualization of the relative firing pattern in a time-resolved manner. ... ...

Measuring spike train synchrony between neuronal populations

Thomas Kreuz;
2009

Abstract

With the increasing availability of multi-unit recordings the focus of attention starts to shift from bivariate methods towards methods that provide the possibility to study patterns of activity across many neurons. Measures of multi-neuron spike train synchrony are becoming indispensable tools for addressing issues such as network synchronization, spike timing reliability and neuronal coding. However, many multi-neuron synchrony measures are extensions of bivariate measures. Two of the most prominent bivariate approaches are the spike train metrics by Victor-Purpura and van Rossum [1,2]. The former evaluates the cost needed to transform one spike train into the other using only certain elementary steps [1], while the latter measures the Euclidean distance between the two spike trains after convolution of the spikes with an exponential function [2]. Both methods involve one parameter that sets the time scale. In contrast, a more recent bivariate approach, the ISI-distance [3], is time scale independent and self-adaptive. Another essential difference is that the ISI-distance relies on the relative length of interspike intervals (ISI) and not on the timing of spikes. Finally, this method also allows the visualization of the relative firing pattern in a time-resolved manner. ... ...
2009
Istituto dei Sistemi Complessi - ISC
Inglese
Don H Johnson
Supplement: Eighteenth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2009
Eighteenth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2009
10_Suppl1
P271
2
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/10/S1/P271
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
18-23/07/2009
Berlin, Germany
spike train synchrony
restricted
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
Kreuz, Thomas; Chicharro, Daniel; Andrzejak, Ralph G.
275
04 Contributo in convegno::04.03 Poster in Atti di convegno
3
   Dynamical Entropies in Assemblies of Neurons
   DEAN
   FP6
   11434
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_274318-doc_76770.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Measuring spike train synchrony between neuronal populations
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 297.71 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
297.71 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/264422
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact