Freshwater Synechococcus appear as single-cells of different morphologies and as microcolonies (from 5 to 50 cells). In oligotrophic lakes the seasonal succession of picocyanobacteria is characterized by the dominance of single-cell Synechococcus in spring followed by the appearance of microcolonies in autumn. In eutrophic lakes microcolonies are made harder to single out because of the presence of the bloom-forming colonials of Microcystis or Aphanothece genera. The issue of formation and persistence of picocyanobacterial microcolonies is the object of this article. More specifically, we address the following questions: 1) Are microcolonies derived from a single-cell or do they result from cell-clumping? 2) Which is the most important factor stimulating microcolony formation? 3) Do bacteria associated to Synechococcus have a role in microcolony formation? 4) Are there interactions between different Synechococcus strains? To answer these questions we undertook laboratory experiments with two freshwater single-cell Synechococcus strains with different phycobiliproteins, to study their morphological response to nanoflagellate grazing and UV radiation (UVR). Over five days, we followed the dynamics of single-cells, microcolonies, and predators by flow cytometry, in semi-continuous cultures with four treatments: +UVR, with and without predators; -UVR, with and without predators. The variations of the maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm) in the treatments were also measured (PhytoPAM) to quantify the fitness of the strains under the different stressing factors. The results obtained allowed us to speculate on the ecological consequences of microcolony formation in the trade-off between Photosystem II activity, growth rate and stress protection of Synechococcus, evaluating the synergistic/antagonistic role of grazing and UVR in microcolony formation. These results can shed light on the dynamics of freshwater Synechococcus morphology in oligotrophic and eutrophic lakes, posing further interesting questions to the microbial ecology of freshwater ecosystems.

Ultima ratio survival strategy of freshwater Synechococcus: from single cells to monoclonal microcolonies

Cristiana Callieri;Stefano Amalfitano;Gianluca Corno;Roberto Bertoni
2013

Abstract

Freshwater Synechococcus appear as single-cells of different morphologies and as microcolonies (from 5 to 50 cells). In oligotrophic lakes the seasonal succession of picocyanobacteria is characterized by the dominance of single-cell Synechococcus in spring followed by the appearance of microcolonies in autumn. In eutrophic lakes microcolonies are made harder to single out because of the presence of the bloom-forming colonials of Microcystis or Aphanothece genera. The issue of formation and persistence of picocyanobacterial microcolonies is the object of this article. More specifically, we address the following questions: 1) Are microcolonies derived from a single-cell or do they result from cell-clumping? 2) Which is the most important factor stimulating microcolony formation? 3) Do bacteria associated to Synechococcus have a role in microcolony formation? 4) Are there interactions between different Synechococcus strains? To answer these questions we undertook laboratory experiments with two freshwater single-cell Synechococcus strains with different phycobiliproteins, to study their morphological response to nanoflagellate grazing and UV radiation (UVR). Over five days, we followed the dynamics of single-cells, microcolonies, and predators by flow cytometry, in semi-continuous cultures with four treatments: +UVR, with and without predators; -UVR, with and without predators. The variations of the maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm) in the treatments were also measured (PhytoPAM) to quantify the fitness of the strains under the different stressing factors. The results obtained allowed us to speculate on the ecological consequences of microcolony formation in the trade-off between Photosystem II activity, growth rate and stress protection of Synechococcus, evaluating the synergistic/antagonistic role of grazing and UVR in microcolony formation. These results can shed light on the dynamics of freshwater Synechococcus morphology in oligotrophic and eutrophic lakes, posing further interesting questions to the microbial ecology of freshwater ecosystems.
2013
Istituto di Ricerca Sulle Acque - IRSA
Istituto di Ricerca sugli Ecosistemi Terrestri - IRET
Picocyanobacteria
Microcolonies
UV
Predation effects
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/264603
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact