The study determined the performance of small-scale commercial firewood processing operations under the typical work conditions of Southern Europe. In particular, five units were tested, fed with the same 2.1-m long beech (Fagus sylvatica L) logs. All machines were tested with sorted and unsorted logs. Productivity varied between 1.1 and 2.1 t h(-1), and cost between 20 and 39 sic t(-1). There were significant differences between machines, which may partly be attributed to operator effect. Feeding the machines with sorted logs had a significant effect on the productivity of all machines on test, increasing productivity by 40% and reducing cost by 34%. Fuel use varied between 1.3 and 2.8 l t(-1). The energy balance was always very favorable. The ration between output and input was never smaller than 59 to 1 and peaked at 130 to 1. In other words, processing required about 1% of the energy contained in the firewood - or 1.7% in the worst case. The productivity figures reported in this experiment were much lower than reported for Northern Europe, which seems to confirm the significant effect of regional work conditions - especially different wood species - on firewood processing performance. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Efficiency of small-scale firewood processing operations in Southern Europe

Spinelli R
2014

Abstract

The study determined the performance of small-scale commercial firewood processing operations under the typical work conditions of Southern Europe. In particular, five units were tested, fed with the same 2.1-m long beech (Fagus sylvatica L) logs. All machines were tested with sorted and unsorted logs. Productivity varied between 1.1 and 2.1 t h(-1), and cost between 20 and 39 sic t(-1). There were significant differences between machines, which may partly be attributed to operator effect. Feeding the machines with sorted logs had a significant effect on the productivity of all machines on test, increasing productivity by 40% and reducing cost by 34%. Fuel use varied between 1.3 and 2.8 l t(-1). The energy balance was always very favorable. The ration between output and input was never smaller than 59 to 1 and peaked at 130 to 1. In other words, processing required about 1% of the energy contained in the firewood - or 1.7% in the worst case. The productivity figures reported in this experiment were much lower than reported for Northern Europe, which seems to confirm the significant effect of regional work conditions - especially different wood species - on firewood processing performance. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
2014
Istituto per la Valorizzazione del Legno e delle Specie Arboree - IVALSA - Sede Sesto Fiorentino
Biomass
Energy
Productivity
Forestry
Beech
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/264627
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 21
social impact