The modern debate over Public Understanding of Science goes back to the early 1990s. Since that time we experienced several changes that touched our understanding of the public, of science communication and of scientists themselves. Although publics are traditional focus of PUS scholars, over the past few years a growing number of scholars have been focusing on scientists as main subject of investigation. As CNR, we run a total of 4 studies focusing, in different ways, on scientists' understanding and practices of science communication to the public. Reflecting on the key continuities and discontinuities that characterize our findings, we will explore some characteristics of scientists' communication activities and views. Our analysis indicates that scientists communicate science through a multiplicity of ways. We suggest that the latter cannot be enclosed in fixed models of science communication circulated amongst academics (deficit/dialogue model), and on the contrary include a variety of activities, opinions and forms of communication. All these formats can play a different role in the future of science communication.

Practices and images of public communication by Italian scientists over the years

Alba L'Astorina;Sveva Avveduto;Loredana Cerbara;Adriana Valente
2013

Abstract

The modern debate over Public Understanding of Science goes back to the early 1990s. Since that time we experienced several changes that touched our understanding of the public, of science communication and of scientists themselves. Although publics are traditional focus of PUS scholars, over the past few years a growing number of scholars have been focusing on scientists as main subject of investigation. As CNR, we run a total of 4 studies focusing, in different ways, on scientists' understanding and practices of science communication to the public. Reflecting on the key continuities and discontinuities that characterize our findings, we will explore some characteristics of scientists' communication activities and views. Our analysis indicates that scientists communicate science through a multiplicity of ways. We suggest that the latter cannot be enclosed in fixed models of science communication circulated amongst academics (deficit/dialogue model), and on the contrary include a variety of activities, opinions and forms of communication. All these formats can play a different role in the future of science communication.
2013
Istituto di Ricerche sulla Popolazione e le Politiche Sociali - IRPPS
Inglese
Beverley Gibbs, Eleanor Hadley - Kershaw, Brigitte Nerlich, Warren Pearce, Harinee Salvadurai, Adam Spencer, Judith Tsouvalis
Critical Perspectives on Making Science Public Selected papers given at the Science in Public conference 2013 at the University of Nottingham 22-23 July 2013
Science in Public conference 2013
75
81
7
22-23 luglio 2013
at the University of Nottingham
public communication of science
4
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
open
274
04 Contributo in convegno::04.02 Abstract in Atti di convegno
L'Astorina, Alba; Avveduto, Sveva; Cerbara, Loredana; Valente, Adriana
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_274920-doc_76943.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Practices and images of public communication by Italian scientists over the years,
Dimensione 2.38 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.38 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/265868
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact