Unfortunately the values for ? HFC in the Abstract and main text and the values on the y-axis of the graph in Fig. 2b were presented as fractions rather than percentages and were therefore 100 times lower than they should have been. The correct values for ? HFC were -3.0% (95% CI -3.3%, -2.7%) for A6 vs -4.0% (95% CI -4.1%, -3.5%) for B2 (p = 0.009).
Erratum to: Eating two larger meals a day (breakfast and lunch) is more effective than six smaller meals in a reduced-energy regimen for patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised crossover study [Diabetologia, (2014), DOI 10.1007/s00125-014-3253-5]
Turá Andrea;
2015
Abstract
Unfortunately the values for ? HFC in the Abstract and main text and the values on the y-axis of the graph in Fig. 2b were presented as fractions rather than percentages and were therefore 100 times lower than they should have been. The correct values for ? HFC were -3.0% (95% CI -3.3%, -2.7%) for A6 vs -4.0% (95% CI -4.1%, -3.5%) for B2 (p = 0.009).File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
