In GPR prospecting strong reflections due to background medium interfaces can hinder the detection of localized buried scatterers. In order to mitigate such clutter, some background removal (clutter rejection) methods can be employed. In this paper, different background removal methods such as a the average trace subtraction, the subspace projection and the entropy time-gating are compared against experimental data collected under laboratory conditions. © 2013 EMA.

Background removal methods in GPR prospecting

Catapano I;Soldovieri F
2013

Abstract

In GPR prospecting strong reflections due to background medium interfaces can hinder the detection of localized buried scatterers. In order to mitigate such clutter, some background removal (clutter rejection) methods can be employed. In this paper, different background removal methods such as a the average trace subtraction, the subspace projection and the entropy time-gating are compared against experimental data collected under laboratory conditions. © 2013 EMA.
2013
Istituto per il Rilevamento Elettromagnetico dell'Ambiente - IREA
Inglese
Proceedings of the 10th European Radar Conference
Radar Conference (EuRAD), 2013 European
85
88
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84893492282&partnerID=q2rCbXpz
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
9-11 Oct. 2013
Nuremberg
Background removal
GPR prospecting
2
none
Solimene R.; Cuccaro A.; Dell'Aversano A.; Catapano I.; Soldovieri F.
273
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
04 Contributo in convegno::04.01 Contributo in Atti di convegno
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/277669
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact