Objectives: To evaluate the radiation dose of the main body CT examinations performed routinely in four regional diagnostic centres, the specific contribution of radiologists and technologists in determining CT dose levels, and the role of radiological staff training in reducing radiation doses. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the radiation dose in terms of dose-length product (DLP) values of 2,016 adult CT examinations (chest, abdomen-pelvis, and whole body) collected in four different centres in our region. DLP values for contrast-unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT examinations performed at each centre were compared for each anatomical area. DLP values for CT examinations performed before and after radiological staff training were also compared. Results: DLP values for the same CT examinations varied among centres depending on radiologists' preferences, variable training of technologists, and diversified CT image acquisition protocols. A specific training programme designed for the radiological staff led to a significant overall reduction of DLP values, along with a significant reduction of DLP variability. Conclusions: Training of both radiologists and technologists plays a key role in optimising CT acquisition procedures and lowering the radiation dose delivered to patients. Main messages: o The effective dose for similar CT examinations varies significantly among radiological centres.o Staff training can significantly reduce and harmonise the radiation dose.o Training of radiologists and technologists is key to optimise CT acquisition protocols. © 2013 The Author(s).

Real practice radiation dose and dosimetric impact of radiological staff training in body CT examinations

Bastiani Luca;Molinaro Sabrina;
2013

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the radiation dose of the main body CT examinations performed routinely in four regional diagnostic centres, the specific contribution of radiologists and technologists in determining CT dose levels, and the role of radiological staff training in reducing radiation doses. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the radiation dose in terms of dose-length product (DLP) values of 2,016 adult CT examinations (chest, abdomen-pelvis, and whole body) collected in four different centres in our region. DLP values for contrast-unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT examinations performed at each centre were compared for each anatomical area. DLP values for CT examinations performed before and after radiological staff training were also compared. Results: DLP values for the same CT examinations varied among centres depending on radiologists' preferences, variable training of technologists, and diversified CT image acquisition protocols. A specific training programme designed for the radiological staff led to a significant overall reduction of DLP values, along with a significant reduction of DLP variability. Conclusions: Training of both radiologists and technologists plays a key role in optimising CT acquisition procedures and lowering the radiation dose delivered to patients. Main messages: o The effective dose for similar CT examinations varies significantly among radiological centres.o Staff training can significantly reduce and harmonise the radiation dose.o Training of radiologists and technologists is key to optimise CT acquisition protocols. © 2013 The Author(s).
2013
Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica - IFC
Radiation protection
Staff training
Radiation dose
Multidetector computed tomography
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_320349-doc_95272.pdf

non disponibili

Descrizione: Real practice radiation dose and dosimetric impact of radiological staff training in body CT examinations
Dimensione 168.26 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
168.26 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/279147
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 19
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact