Introduction and objectives: In the absence of right ventricular hypertrophy or bundle-branch block, a prominent R wave in V1 or V2 is considered to reflect a lateral myocardial infarction. We investigated the differences in infarct location, size and transmural extent between patients with prominent R wave in V1 and those with prominent R wave in V2. Methods: We studied 50 patients with a previous first infarction involving left ventricular inferior and/or lateral wall at contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance. Results: A prominent R wave in V1 was present in 8 patients (16%), in V2 in 23 (46%). At magnetic resonance, the infarction involved the inferior wall in 11 patients (22%), the lateral wall in 6 (12%), and both walls in 33 patients (66%). The sensitivity of a prominent R wave in V1 in detecting a lateral infarction was low (17.9%), while the specificity was high (90.9%). The sensitivity and specificity of a prominent R wave in V2 were 46.2% and 54.5%, respectively. In patients with a prominent R wave in V1, infarct size and lateral and transmural extent were greater than in patients without this pattern (P<.005, <.001, and <.05, respectively); conversely, infarct size and transmural extent in the inferior wall and in its basal-posterior segment were not significantly different. In patients with a prominent R wave in V2, infarct size, lateral and transmural extent were not different from patients without this pattern. Conclusions: Only a prominent R wave in V1 is a specific sign of large and transmural lateral infarction

A Prominent R Wave in V-1 but not in V-2 Is a Specific Sign of a Large Lateral Transmural Infarction

Rossi Giuseppe;
2012

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: In the absence of right ventricular hypertrophy or bundle-branch block, a prominent R wave in V1 or V2 is considered to reflect a lateral myocardial infarction. We investigated the differences in infarct location, size and transmural extent between patients with prominent R wave in V1 and those with prominent R wave in V2. Methods: We studied 50 patients with a previous first infarction involving left ventricular inferior and/or lateral wall at contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance. Results: A prominent R wave in V1 was present in 8 patients (16%), in V2 in 23 (46%). At magnetic resonance, the infarction involved the inferior wall in 11 patients (22%), the lateral wall in 6 (12%), and both walls in 33 patients (66%). The sensitivity of a prominent R wave in V1 in detecting a lateral infarction was low (17.9%), while the specificity was high (90.9%). The sensitivity and specificity of a prominent R wave in V2 were 46.2% and 54.5%, respectively. In patients with a prominent R wave in V1, infarct size and lateral and transmural extent were greater than in patients without this pattern (P<.005, <.001, and <.05, respectively); conversely, infarct size and transmural extent in the inferior wall and in its basal-posterior segment were not significantly different. In patients with a prominent R wave in V2, infarct size, lateral and transmural extent were not different from patients without this pattern. Conclusions: Only a prominent R wave in V1 is a specific sign of large and transmural lateral infarction
2012
Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica - IFC
Electrocardiography
Myocardial infarction
Magnetic resonance imaging
Imaging
Coronary disease
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_312219-doc_89049.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: A Prominent R Wave in V-1 but not in V-2 Is a Specific Sign of a Large Lateral Transmural Infarction
Dimensione 308.59 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
308.59 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/279216
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact