The root-mean-square (rms) differences between the Canadian air quality model GEM-AQ and measurements for intensive and extensive optical variables (aerosol optical depth or AOD and Ångström exponent or ?) were investigated using data from the July 2002 Québec smoke event. In order to quantify regional differences between model and measurements we employed a three component analysis of rms differences. The behaviour of the two absolute amplitude rms components of AOD (difference of the means and the difference of the standard deviations) enabled us to infer emission properties which would otherwise have been masked by the larger 'anti-correlation' component. We found the inferred emission fluxes to be significantly higher than the original geostationary, satellite-derived FLAMBÉ (fire locating and modelling of burning emissions) emissions flux estimates employed as inputs to the simulations. The model captured the regional decrease of the intensive ? exponent (increase of particle size with trajectory time), while the agreement with the extensive AOD parameter was marginal but clearly dependent on the nature of the spatio-temporal statistical tools employed to characterize model performance. In establishing the ? versus trajectory time trend, the modelled AOD data was filtered in the same way as the measured data (very large AODs are eliminated). This processing of modelled results was deemed necessary in order to render the ? results comparable with the measurements; in the latter case it was difficult, if not impossible, to discriminate between measured ? trends due to instrumental artifacts (non-linearities at low signal strength) versus trends due to coagulative effects. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Evaluation of the GEM-AQ air quality model during the Québec smoke event of 2002: Analysis of extensive and intensive optical disparities

Campanelli Monica;
2006

Abstract

The root-mean-square (rms) differences between the Canadian air quality model GEM-AQ and measurements for intensive and extensive optical variables (aerosol optical depth or AOD and Ångström exponent or ?) were investigated using data from the July 2002 Québec smoke event. In order to quantify regional differences between model and measurements we employed a three component analysis of rms differences. The behaviour of the two absolute amplitude rms components of AOD (difference of the means and the difference of the standard deviations) enabled us to infer emission properties which would otherwise have been masked by the larger 'anti-correlation' component. We found the inferred emission fluxes to be significantly higher than the original geostationary, satellite-derived FLAMBÉ (fire locating and modelling of burning emissions) emissions flux estimates employed as inputs to the simulations. The model captured the regional decrease of the intensive ? exponent (increase of particle size with trajectory time), while the agreement with the extensive AOD parameter was marginal but clearly dependent on the nature of the spatio-temporal statistical tools employed to characterize model performance. In establishing the ? versus trajectory time trend, the modelled AOD data was filtered in the same way as the measured data (very large AODs are eliminated). This processing of modelled results was deemed necessary in order to render the ? results comparable with the measurements; in the latter case it was difficult, if not impossible, to discriminate between measured ? trends due to instrumental artifacts (non-linearities at low signal strength) versus trends due to coagulative effects. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
2006
Istituto di Scienze dell'Atmosfera e del Clima - ISAC
Ångström exponent
Aerosol optical depth
Forest fire
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/282124
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 23
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact