Brain-damagedpatientswithright-sidedunilateralspatialneglect(USN)oftenmakeleft-sidederrorsin reading singlewordsorpseudowords(neglectdyslexia,ND).Weproposethatbothleftneglectandlow fixation accuracyaccountforreadingerrorsinneglectdyslexia. EyemovementswererecordedinUSNpatientswith(ND+) andwithout(ND) neglectdyslexiaand in amatchedcontrolgroupofrightbrain-damagedpatientswithoutneglect(USN). UnlikeND and controls, ND+ patients showedleftlateralizedomissionerrorsandadistortedeyemovementpatternin both areadingaloudtaskandanon-verbalsaccadictask.Duringreading,thetotalnumberof fixations waslargerinthesepatientsindependentofvisualhemispace,andmost fixations wereinaccurate. Similarly,inthesaccadictaskonlyND+ patients wereunabletoreachthemovingdot.Athird experimentaddressedthenatureoftheleftlateralizationinreadingerrordistributionbysimulating neglect dyslexiainND patients. ND and USN patients hadtoperformaspeededreading-at- threshold taskthatdidnotallowforeyemovements.Whenstimulusexplorationwasprevented,ND patients, butnotcontrols,producedapatternoferrorssimilartothatofND+ with unlimitedexposure time (e.g.,left-sidederrors). WeconcludethatneglectdyslexiareadingerrorsmayariseinUSNpatientsasaconsequenceofan additional andindependentdeficit unrelatedtotheorthographicmaterial.Inparticular,thepresenceof an alteredoculo-motorpattern,preventingtheautomaticexecutionofthe fine saccadiceyemovements involvedinreading,uncovers,inUSNpatients,theattentionalbiasalsoinreadingsinglecentrally presentedwords.

Neglect dyslexia: A matter of "good looking"

2013

Abstract

Brain-damagedpatientswithright-sidedunilateralspatialneglect(USN)oftenmakeleft-sidederrorsin reading singlewordsorpseudowords(neglectdyslexia,ND).Weproposethatbothleftneglectandlow fixation accuracyaccountforreadingerrorsinneglectdyslexia. EyemovementswererecordedinUSNpatientswith(ND+) andwithout(ND) neglectdyslexiaand in amatchedcontrolgroupofrightbrain-damagedpatientswithoutneglect(USN). UnlikeND and controls, ND+ patients showedleftlateralizedomissionerrorsandadistortedeyemovementpatternin both areadingaloudtaskandanon-verbalsaccadictask.Duringreading,thetotalnumberof fixations waslargerinthesepatientsindependentofvisualhemispace,andmost fixations wereinaccurate. Similarly,inthesaccadictaskonlyND+ patients wereunabletoreachthemovingdot.Athird experimentaddressedthenatureoftheleftlateralizationinreadingerrordistributionbysimulating neglect dyslexiainND patients. ND and USN patients hadtoperformaspeededreading-at- threshold taskthatdidnotallowforeyemovements.Whenstimulusexplorationwasprevented,ND patients, butnotcontrols,producedapatternoferrorssimilartothatofND+ with unlimitedexposure time (e.g.,left-sidederrors). WeconcludethatneglectdyslexiareadingerrorsmayariseinUSNpatientsasaconsequenceofan additional andindependentdeficit unrelatedtotheorthographicmaterial.Inparticular,thepresenceof an alteredoculo-motorpattern,preventingtheautomaticexecutionofthe fine saccadiceyemovements involvedinreading,uncovers,inUSNpatients,theattentionalbiasalsoinreadingsinglecentrally presentedwords.
2013
Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione - ISTC
Neglect
Neglect dyslexia
Reading
Eye movements
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/292316
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 15
social impact