Deeply understanding the plasma response to 3D fields is crucial to optimize tokamak operation, e.g. for ELM mitigation or error field control, and to make robust extrapolations to future devices. To this aim, the response to n=1 rotating fields was measured with unprecedented resolution in ASDEX Upgrade hybrid plasmas with ? up to the no-wall limit. The poloidal structure of 3D boundary distortions is measured along a full poloidal angle by multiple diagnostics (SXR, Lithium beam, ECE-Imaging, HFS/LFS magnetics). It is dominated by non-resonant poloidal harmonics, m>nq, consistent with stable kink/peeling modes amplifying n=1 fields, as predicted by the linear MHD code MARS-K. The internal response is measured from HFS to LFS by multi-chord SXR cameras and interferometers. It peaks in the core, with an m=1 displacement of 1cm. Qualitative agreement is found with ideal MHD codes MARS-K and V3FIT-VMEC, predicting large internal kink response when the safety factor has a minimum just above one, as in these hybrid plasmas. Effects beyond ideal MHD can affect the response profile: MARS-K finds sensible changes in the core when drift-kinetic damping is included, a prediction being tested by comparison with synthetic diagnostics. Two-fluid effects are studied with M3D-C1. The helical core distortion impacts the plasma, strongly braking core toroidal rotation. Associated e.m. and NTV torques are calculated by MARS-K and the stellarator codes DKES/PENTA. To extend the experimental basis for model validation, a comparison is made with 3D response measurements by SXR cameras and high-resolution magnetics in DIII-D high-? plasmas as similar as possible to ASDEX Upgrade. In both experiments the 3D response is largely due to stable ideal kinks, but nonideal effects are predicted to cause sizable changes to its internal profile. Quantitative comparison with experiment is assessing their impact, an important step to validate 3D equilibrium codes.

High-resolution internal measurements of 3D plasma response for model validation in high-beta plasmas

Piovesan P;Marrelli L;Gobbin M;Terranova D;
2015

Abstract

Deeply understanding the plasma response to 3D fields is crucial to optimize tokamak operation, e.g. for ELM mitigation or error field control, and to make robust extrapolations to future devices. To this aim, the response to n=1 rotating fields was measured with unprecedented resolution in ASDEX Upgrade hybrid plasmas with ? up to the no-wall limit. The poloidal structure of 3D boundary distortions is measured along a full poloidal angle by multiple diagnostics (SXR, Lithium beam, ECE-Imaging, HFS/LFS magnetics). It is dominated by non-resonant poloidal harmonics, m>nq, consistent with stable kink/peeling modes amplifying n=1 fields, as predicted by the linear MHD code MARS-K. The internal response is measured from HFS to LFS by multi-chord SXR cameras and interferometers. It peaks in the core, with an m=1 displacement of 1cm. Qualitative agreement is found with ideal MHD codes MARS-K and V3FIT-VMEC, predicting large internal kink response when the safety factor has a minimum just above one, as in these hybrid plasmas. Effects beyond ideal MHD can affect the response profile: MARS-K finds sensible changes in the core when drift-kinetic damping is included, a prediction being tested by comparison with synthetic diagnostics. Two-fluid effects are studied with M3D-C1. The helical core distortion impacts the plasma, strongly braking core toroidal rotation. Associated e.m. and NTV torques are calculated by MARS-K and the stellarator codes DKES/PENTA. To extend the experimental basis for model validation, a comparison is made with 3D response measurements by SXR cameras and high-resolution magnetics in DIII-D high-? plasmas as similar as possible to ASDEX Upgrade. In both experiments the 3D response is largely due to stable ideal kinks, but nonideal effects are predicted to cause sizable changes to its internal profile. Quantitative comparison with experiment is assessing their impact, an important step to validate 3D equilibrium codes.
2015
Istituto gas ionizzati - IGI - Sede Padova
Inglese
EPS europhysics conference abstracts - 42nd EPS Conference on Plasma Physics
42nd EPS Conference on Plasma Physics
2-914771-98-3
http://ocs.ciemat.es/EPS2015PAP/pdf/P1.144.pdf
European Physical Society (EPS)
Mulhouse
FRANCIA
22-26 June 2015
Lisbon, Portugal
-
P1.144
22
none
Piovesan, P; Igochine, V; Liu, Yq; Maraschek, M; Marrelli, L; Ryan, Da; Suttrop, W; Weiland, M; Yadykin, D; Gobbin, M; Terranova, D; Ferraro, Nm; Lanc...espandi
273
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
04 Contributo in convegno::04.01 Contributo in Atti di convegno
   Implementation of activities described in the Roadmap to Fusion during Horizon 2020 through a Joint programme of the members of the EUROfusion consortium
   EUROfusion
   H2020
   633053
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/301288
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact