The modern debate over Public Understanding of Science goes back to the early 1990s. Since that time we experienced several changes that touched our understanding of the public, of science communication and of scientists themselves. Although publics are traditional focus of PUS scholars, over the past few years a growing number of scholars have been focusing on scientists as main subject of investigation. As CNR, we run a total of 4 studies focusing, in different ways, on scientists' understanding and practices of science communication to the public. Reflecting on the key continuities and discontinuities that characterize our findings, we will explore some characteristics of scientists' communication activities and views. Our analysis indicates that scientists communicate science through a multiplicity of ways. We suggest that the latter cannot be enclosed in fixed models of science communication circulated amongst academics (deficit/dialogue model), and on the contrary include a variety of activities, opinions and forms of communication. All these formats can play a different role in the future of science communication.

Practices and images of public communication by Italian scientists over the years

Alba L'Astorina;Sveva Avveduto;Loredana Cerbara;Adriana Valente
2013

Abstract

The modern debate over Public Understanding of Science goes back to the early 1990s. Since that time we experienced several changes that touched our understanding of the public, of science communication and of scientists themselves. Although publics are traditional focus of PUS scholars, over the past few years a growing number of scholars have been focusing on scientists as main subject of investigation. As CNR, we run a total of 4 studies focusing, in different ways, on scientists' understanding and practices of science communication to the public. Reflecting on the key continuities and discontinuities that characterize our findings, we will explore some characteristics of scientists' communication activities and views. Our analysis indicates that scientists communicate science through a multiplicity of ways. We suggest that the latter cannot be enclosed in fixed models of science communication circulated amongst academics (deficit/dialogue model), and on the contrary include a variety of activities, opinions and forms of communication. All these formats can play a different role in the future of science communication.
2013
communication
public engagement
public participation
science and technology studies
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_351354-doc_112486.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: articolo Nottingham
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione 4.22 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.22 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/313521
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact