Congenital hearing loss is the most frequent birth defect. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing established quality of care process indicators for Universal Newborn Hearing Screening starting from 1999. In a previous systematic review of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening studies we highlighted substantial variability in program design and in reported performance data. In order to overcome these heterogeneous findings we think it is necessary to optimize the implementation of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening programs with an appropriate application of the planning, executing, and monitoring, verifications and reporting phases. For this reason we propose a conceptual framework that logically integrates these three phases and, consequently, a tool (a check-list) for their rationalization and standardization. Our paper intends to stimulate debate on how to ameliorate the routine application of high quality Universal Newborn Hearing Screening programs. The conceptual framework is proposed to optimize, rationalise and standardise their implementation. The checklist is intended to allow an inter-program comparison by removing heterogeneity in processes description and assessment.

A conceptual framework for rationalized and standardized Universal Newborn Hearing Screening (UNHS) programs

Leo CG;Mincarone P;
2016

Abstract

Congenital hearing loss is the most frequent birth defect. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing established quality of care process indicators for Universal Newborn Hearing Screening starting from 1999. In a previous systematic review of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening studies we highlighted substantial variability in program design and in reported performance data. In order to overcome these heterogeneous findings we think it is necessary to optimize the implementation of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening programs with an appropriate application of the planning, executing, and monitoring, verifications and reporting phases. For this reason we propose a conceptual framework that logically integrates these three phases and, consequently, a tool (a check-list) for their rationalization and standardization. Our paper intends to stimulate debate on how to ameliorate the routine application of high quality Universal Newborn Hearing Screening programs. The conceptual framework is proposed to optimize, rationalise and standardise their implementation. The checklist is intended to allow an inter-program comparison by removing heterogeneity in processes description and assessment.
2016
Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica - IFC
Istituto di Ricerche sulla Popolazione e le Politiche Sociali - IRPPS
Universal Newborn Hearing Screening
Checklist
Quality improvement
UNHS
checklist
quality improvement
unhs
universal newborn hearing screening
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_347216-doc_109177.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: A conceptual framework for rationalized and standardized Universal Newborn Hearing Screening (UNHS) programs
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione 1.32 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.32 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
prod_347216-doc_109829.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: A conceptual framework for rationalized and standardized Universal Newborn Hearing Screening (UNHS) programs -Supplement 1
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione 82.23 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
82.23 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
prod_347216-doc_109834.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: A conceptual framework for rationalized and standardized Universal Newborn Hearing Screening (UNHS) programs -Supplement 2
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione 136.01 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
136.01 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/314870
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact