The bacterial species Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens encompasses a group of closely related phytopathogens subdivided into pathovars that exhibit differences in host range. To date, reliable differentiation of pathovars and identification of unknown isolates to the pathovar-level can only be achieved on the basis of host testing. In this study, representative strains from C. flaccumfaciens pathovars and related species were examined using a range of genomic fingerprinting techniques to ascertain their application as additional or potential alternatives to host testing. Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and repetitive sequence polymerase chain reaction (rep-PCR) analyses enabled the categorisation of some, but not all strains, in their respective pathovars. In contrast, all strains were correctly assigned to pathovars using HindIII and XbaI macro-restriction digests in conjunction with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Fingerprints generated by PFGE not only supported the current pathovar rankings within C. flaccumfaciens, they also identified subgroups within pathovars flaccumfaciens, oortii and poinsettiae.
Characterization of curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pathovars by AFLP, rep-PCR and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.
Palmano S;
2003
Abstract
The bacterial species Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens encompasses a group of closely related phytopathogens subdivided into pathovars that exhibit differences in host range. To date, reliable differentiation of pathovars and identification of unknown isolates to the pathovar-level can only be achieved on the basis of host testing. In this study, representative strains from C. flaccumfaciens pathovars and related species were examined using a range of genomic fingerprinting techniques to ascertain their application as additional or potential alternatives to host testing. Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and repetitive sequence polymerase chain reaction (rep-PCR) analyses enabled the categorisation of some, but not all strains, in their respective pathovars. In contrast, all strains were correctly assigned to pathovars using HindIII and XbaI macro-restriction digests in conjunction with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Fingerprints generated by PFGE not only supported the current pathovar rankings within C. flaccumfaciens, they also identified subgroups within pathovars flaccumfaciens, oortii and poinsettiae.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.