This work analyses the recent evolution of statistical learning methods in JET for the prediction of disruptions. Disruption predictors are implemented as binary classification systems (two labels are possible: 'disruptive' and 'non-disruptive') whose training process is strongly related to the existence of disruption precursors in the signals. So far, the best predictors (in terms of success rate, false alarm rate and enough anticipation time) have used a combination of the time and frequency domains from the plasma signals to distinguish between disruptive and non-disruptive behaviors. Three different types of predictors are reviewed. Their difference is the amount of information that is needed to carry out the respective training processes: Thousands of past discharges (for instance, the APODIS predictor), very limited data from previous discharges (for example, a particular APODIS version and Venn predictors) and no requirement at all from earlier shots.

Disruption precursor detection: Combining the time and frequency domains

Murari A;
2015

Abstract

This work analyses the recent evolution of statistical learning methods in JET for the prediction of disruptions. Disruption predictors are implemented as binary classification systems (two labels are possible: 'disruptive' and 'non-disruptive') whose training process is strongly related to the existence of disruption precursors in the signals. So far, the best predictors (in terms of success rate, false alarm rate and enough anticipation time) have used a combination of the time and frequency domains from the plasma signals to distinguish between disruptive and non-disruptive behaviors. Three different types of predictors are reviewed. Their difference is the amount of information that is needed to carry out the respective training processes: Thousands of past discharges (for instance, the APODIS predictor), very limited data from previous discharges (for example, a particular APODIS version and Venn predictors) and no requirement at all from earlier shots.
2015
Istituto gas ionizzati - IGI - Sede Padova
Inglese
2015 IEEE 26th Symposium on Fusion Engineering (SOFE)
26th IEEE Symposium on Fusion Engineering (SOFE)
8
9781479982646
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7482361/?arnumber=7482361&tag=1
IEEE
New York
STATI UNITI D'AMERICA
May 31 - June 4, 2015
Austin, Texas, USA
anomaly detection
disruption precursors
disruption prediction
outlier detection
SVM
Venn predictors
Article Number: 7482361; Print ISSN: 1078-8891; Cd-ROM ISSN: 2155-9945; This work was partially funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness under the Projects No ENE2012-38970-C04-01 and ENE2012-38970-C04-03. This work has been carried out within the framework of the EUROfusion Consortium and has received funding from the Euratom research and training programme 2014-2018 under grant agreement No 633053; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84978821835&partnerID=q2rCbXpz
6
none
Vega, J; Moreno, R; Pereira, A; Ratta, Ga; Murari, A; Dormidocanto, S
273
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
04 Contributo in convegno::04.01 Contributo in Atti di convegno
   Implementation of activities described in the Roadmap to Fusion during Horizon 2020 through a Joint programme of the members of the EUROfusion consortium
   EUROfusion
   H2020
   633053
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/316689
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact