Users online tend to select information that support and adhere their beliefs, and to form polarized groups sharing the same view - e.g. echo chambers. Algorithms for content promotion may favour this phenomenon, by accounting for users preferences and thus limiting the exposure to unsolicited contents. To shade light on this question, we perform a comparative study on how same contents (videos) are consumed on different online social media - i.e. Facebook and YouTube - over a sample of 12M of users. Our findings show that content drives the emergence of echo chambers on both platforms. Moreover, we show that the users' commenting patterns are accurate predictors for the formation of echo-chambers.

Users polarization on Facebook and Youtube

Antonio Scala;Guido Caldarelli;
2016

Abstract

Users online tend to select information that support and adhere their beliefs, and to form polarized groups sharing the same view - e.g. echo chambers. Algorithms for content promotion may favour this phenomenon, by accounting for users preferences and thus limiting the exposure to unsolicited contents. To shade light on this question, we perform a comparative study on how same contents (videos) are consumed on different online social media - i.e. Facebook and YouTube - over a sample of 12M of users. Our findings show that content drives the emergence of echo chambers on both platforms. Moreover, we show that the users' commenting patterns are accurate predictors for the formation of echo-chambers.
2016
Istituto dei Sistemi Complessi - ISC
echo chambers
misinformation
social media
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_363104-doc_119687.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Users polarization on Facebook and Youtube
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.38 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.38 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/317021
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 204
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 157
social impact