Currently, nearly 70% of the reentries of intact orbital objects are uncontrolled, corresponding to about 50% of the returning mass, i.e. approximately 100 metric tons per year. In 2015, 79% of the mass was concentrated in 40 upper stages and the remaining 21% mostly in about ten large spacecraft. The average mass of the sizable objects was around 2 metric tons. Predicting the reentry time and location of an uncontrolled object remains a very tricky task, being affected by various sources of inevitable uncertainty. In spite of decades of efforts, mean relative errors of 20-30% often occur. This means that even predictions issued 3 hours before reentry may be affected by an along-track uncertainty of 40,000 km (corresponding to one full orbital path), possibly halved during the last hour if further tracking data are available. This kind of information is not much useful and manageable for civil protection applications, often resulting in confusion and misunderstandings regarding its precise meaning and relevance. Therefore, specific approaches and procedures have been developed to provide understandable and unambiguous information useful for civil protection planning and applications, as shown in practice for recent reentry prediction campaigns of significant satellites (UARS, ROSAT, Phobos-Grunt, GOCE, Progress-M 27M).

Reentry predictions of potentially dangerous uncontrolled satellites: challenges and civil protection applications

Pardini C;Anselmo L
2016

Abstract

Currently, nearly 70% of the reentries of intact orbital objects are uncontrolled, corresponding to about 50% of the returning mass, i.e. approximately 100 metric tons per year. In 2015, 79% of the mass was concentrated in 40 upper stages and the remaining 21% mostly in about ten large spacecraft. The average mass of the sizable objects was around 2 metric tons. Predicting the reentry time and location of an uncontrolled object remains a very tricky task, being affected by various sources of inevitable uncertainty. In spite of decades of efforts, mean relative errors of 20-30% often occur. This means that even predictions issued 3 hours before reentry may be affected by an along-track uncertainty of 40,000 km (corresponding to one full orbital path), possibly halved during the last hour if further tracking data are available. This kind of information is not much useful and manageable for civil protection applications, often resulting in confusion and misunderstandings regarding its precise meaning and relevance. Therefore, specific approaches and procedures have been developed to provide understandable and unambiguous information useful for civil protection planning and applications, as shown in practice for recent reentry prediction campaigns of significant satellites (UARS, ROSAT, Phobos-Grunt, GOCE, Progress-M 27M).
2016
Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell'Informazione "Alessandro Faedo" - ISTI
Uncontrolled reentry
Reentry predictions
Uncertainty windows
Risk objects
Sub-satellite ground track
Civil protection applications
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_362234-doc_119245.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Reentry predictions of potentially dangerous uncontrolled satellites: challenges and civil protection applications
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione 713.42 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
713.42 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/317665
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact