Soil management in vineyard inter-rows has a great influence on soil hydraulic conductivity and bulk density, and, consequently,on runoff and soil erosion processes at the field scale. The maintenance of bare soil in vineyard inter-rows withtillage, as well as the tractor traffic, are known to expose the soil to compaction, reduction of soil water holding capacityand increase of runoff and erosion . The use of grass cover is one of the most common and effective practices in orderto reduce such threats. It is therefore important to relate rainfall characteristics, soil properties and response in terms ofrunoff and soil erosion, from yearly to seasonal and to single event temporal scales. The objective of this work is to quantifythe temporal variability of the effects of two different kind of inter-row management on soil hydrological properties,runoff and erosion in vineyards. For this reason two vineyard field-scale plots in the Alto Monferrato vine-growing area(Piedmont, NW Italy) were monitored in two years. The inter-rows were managed with conventional tillage (CT) andgrass cover (GC), respectively. Fifteen series of infiltration tests were carried out during a 2-year period of observation(October 2012 to November 2014). In order to take into account the effect of tractors traffic, the tests were done on thetrack, and outside the track. Furthermore, a dataset of 29 rainfall-runoff events covering a wide range of topsoil characteristicswas collected in the two plots, along with soil water content and runoff discharge monitoring, and determination ofsediment yield in case of erosive events. An optical disdrometer installed in the plots provided also 1-min rainfall intensitydata. In summer, just one month after tillage, CT soil showed very low hydraulic conductivity, so storms were ableto cause Hortonian runoff and soil losses up to 5.7 Mg ha-1. In autumn and winter very high saturation-excess runoff wasobserved in CT, that reached 83% of the precipitation. Runoff in the grass cover plot was mainly due to saturation of thetopsoil, and the annual reduction of runoff in the GC plot was about 63%. Soil erosion up to 1.2 Mg ha-1 in a single eventwas observed in the GC vineyard in winter. In each year of observation, most of the erosion occurred during a singleevent, while the total annual erosion was up to 9 times higher in the CT treatment than in the GC.

Temporal variability of soil management effects on soil hydrological properties, runoff and erosion at the field scale in a hillslope vineyard, North-West Italy

Marcella Biddoccu;Stefano Ferraris;Eugenio Cavallo
2016

Abstract

Soil management in vineyard inter-rows has a great influence on soil hydraulic conductivity and bulk density, and, consequently,on runoff and soil erosion processes at the field scale. The maintenance of bare soil in vineyard inter-rows withtillage, as well as the tractor traffic, are known to expose the soil to compaction, reduction of soil water holding capacityand increase of runoff and erosion . The use of grass cover is one of the most common and effective practices in orderto reduce such threats. It is therefore important to relate rainfall characteristics, soil properties and response in terms ofrunoff and soil erosion, from yearly to seasonal and to single event temporal scales. The objective of this work is to quantifythe temporal variability of the effects of two different kind of inter-row management on soil hydrological properties,runoff and erosion in vineyards. For this reason two vineyard field-scale plots in the Alto Monferrato vine-growing area(Piedmont, NW Italy) were monitored in two years. The inter-rows were managed with conventional tillage (CT) andgrass cover (GC), respectively. Fifteen series of infiltration tests were carried out during a 2-year period of observation(October 2012 to November 2014). In order to take into account the effect of tractors traffic, the tests were done on thetrack, and outside the track. Furthermore, a dataset of 29 rainfall-runoff events covering a wide range of topsoil characteristicswas collected in the two plots, along with soil water content and runoff discharge monitoring, and determination ofsediment yield in case of erosive events. An optical disdrometer installed in the plots provided also 1-min rainfall intensitydata. In summer, just one month after tillage, CT soil showed very low hydraulic conductivity, so storms were ableto cause Hortonian runoff and soil losses up to 5.7 Mg ha-1. In autumn and winter very high saturation-excess runoff wasobserved in CT, that reached 83% of the precipitation. Runoff in the grass cover plot was mainly due to saturation of thetopsoil, and the annual reduction of runoff in the GC plot was about 63%. Soil erosion up to 1.2 Mg ha-1 in a single eventwas observed in the GC vineyard in winter. In each year of observation, most of the erosion occurred during a singleevent, while the total annual erosion was up to 9 times higher in the CT treatment than in the GC.
2016
Istituto per le Macchine Agricole e Movimento Terra - IMAMOTER - Sede Ferrara
Istituto di Geoscienze e Georisorse - IGG - Sede Pisa
Soil management,
Vineyards,
Soil hydrological properties
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_357382-doc_169225.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Temporal variability of soil management effects POSTPRINT
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 1.24 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.24 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
prod_357382-doc_118873.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Temporal variability of soil management effects on soil hydrological properties
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 2.94 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.94 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/318016
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 119
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 103
social impact