The Frascati and Oslo manuals assemble scientific activities, technological activities and their definitions in generic manner, without attempting to propose a rigorous and cogent organization of the categories. Such uncertainties could possibly be overcome by an attempt to formulate a coherent, holistic classification, retracing the indications of previous scholars concerning the broader characteristics of scientific discovery and tech- nological innovation. From such an attempt, we gather the lesson that scholars of tech- nological innovation and scientific progress must at all times be ready to reopen debate on the assertions that they have thus far formulated.

First steps towards a consistent classification of innovation

Mario De Marchi
2016

Abstract

The Frascati and Oslo manuals assemble scientific activities, technological activities and their definitions in generic manner, without attempting to propose a rigorous and cogent organization of the categories. Such uncertainties could possibly be overcome by an attempt to formulate a coherent, holistic classification, retracing the indications of previous scholars concerning the broader characteristics of scientific discovery and tech- nological innovation. From such an attempt, we gather the lesson that scholars of tech- nological innovation and scientific progress must at all times be ready to reopen debate on the assertions that they have thus far formulated.
2016
Istituto di Ricerca sulla Crescita Economica Sostenibile - IRCrES
Technological innovation Scientific research
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/319672
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact