Aim of this paper was to assess the discrimination power of a novel ultrasound (US) parameter, called the Fragility Score (F.S.), in the early identification of subjects prone to osteoporotic fractures. A total of 102 female patients were recruited: 49 with a recent osteoporotic fracture (''frail" subjects), 53 were controls without fracture history (''non-frail" subjects). All the patients underwent a spinal DXA (dual X-ray absorptiometry) and an abdominal US scan of lumbar vertebrae. Acquired US data were analyzed by a novel algorithm, which calculated the F.S. through spectral and statistical analyses involving both echographic images and corresponding ''raw" signals. F.S. showed a good performance in discriminating ''frail" from ''non-frail" subjects (sensitivity = 76%, specificity = 68%), resulting even slightly more effective than DXA-measured BMD (sensitivity = 73%, specificity = 66%). This methodology has a potential to become an effective tool for the early identification, and timely treatment, of ''frail" subjects.

A quantitative ultrasound approach to estimate bone fragility: A first comparison with dual X-ray absorptiometry

Paola Pisani;Francesco Conversano;Ernesto Casciaro;Sergio Casciaro
2017

Abstract

Aim of this paper was to assess the discrimination power of a novel ultrasound (US) parameter, called the Fragility Score (F.S.), in the early identification of subjects prone to osteoporotic fractures. A total of 102 female patients were recruited: 49 with a recent osteoporotic fracture (''frail" subjects), 53 were controls without fracture history (''non-frail" subjects). All the patients underwent a spinal DXA (dual X-ray absorptiometry) and an abdominal US scan of lumbar vertebrae. Acquired US data were analyzed by a novel algorithm, which calculated the F.S. through spectral and statistical analyses involving both echographic images and corresponding ''raw" signals. F.S. showed a good performance in discriminating ''frail" from ''non-frail" subjects (sensitivity = 76%, specificity = 68%), resulting even slightly more effective than DXA-measured BMD (sensitivity = 73%, specificity = 66%). This methodology has a potential to become an effective tool for the early identification, and timely treatment, of ''frail" subjects.
2017
Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica - IFC
Ultrasound Osteoporosis; Fracture risk assessment; Dual X-ray absorptiometry; Biomedical signal processing; Biomedical image processing; Biomedical measurements.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_356913-doc_160519.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: 2017_Measurement_Pisani et al_Fragility Score vs DXA
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Dimensione 932.63 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
932.63 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/320867
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact